[PC-NCSG] CSG decision regarding our candidate

Sun Jun 1 18:19:56 EEST 2014

Hi,

Perhaps he did not have a chance for stray votes, just as i never had a
chance to go up against NOTA in a third round.  He was selected as the
compromise candidate and that did not work.  Now we move on.

Yes, we disagree.
This is something the rest of the PC will have to weigh in on.

avri

On 01-Jun-14 16:53, Klaus Stoll wrote:
> Dear Colleagues
> 
> On 6/1/2014 2:44 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I do not think that makes sense.  We already know that he is not going
>> to get their votes.
> 
> to get their votes.
> 
> I very strongly disagree with this! You had your chance to see if there
> are any stray votes, Sam has the same right to have a chance to collect
> stray votes. In fact I have a feeling that he might be able to pick 2
> votes up, he was well received by some.
>>
>> First we need to come to a mutual decide that none of the previous
>> candidates are qualified to run.
> Agree, on the other side, why should we allow Bill to take the due
> process hostage?
>>
>> Then CSG and NCSG pick 2 new candidates
> See above, much too early! Sam needs to have his day!
>> And we come up with a procedure that terminates - like the one i
>> suggested.
> We should discuss this, but nothing is agreed and decided!
> 
> Yours
> 
> Klaus
>>
>> avri
>>
>>
>> On 01-Jun-14 15:29, Klaus Stoll wrote:
>>> Dear Friends
>>>
>>> Greetings. We should be disappointed but not beaten. We should still put
>>> Sam up as a candidate and have one if not three round of votes on him.
>>> We might be n for a pleasant surprise.
>>>
>>> Yours
>>>
>>> Klaus
>>>
>>> On 5/30/2014 11:54 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>>> Hi Everybody,
>>>>
>>>> Steve Metalitz just informed me that CSG cannot support Sam candidate.
>>>> I am really for Sam and definitely don't like bringing those kind of
>>>> news.
>>>>
>>>> we shouldn't wait for CSG to come with proposals and we should be more
>>>> proactive in this regard.
>>>> first thing is to agree about deadline to elect board member to impose
>>>> some visibility. agree on election process. I don't know if they will
>>>> propose to meet in London but I would like the NCSG PC to work on that
>>>> before.
>>>>
>>>> looking to hear your comments.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Rafik
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: *Metalitz, Steven* <met at msk.com <mailto:met at msk.com>>
>>>> Date: 2014-05-31 6:11 GMT+09:00
>>>> Subject: RE: FW: CSG call with Sam Lanfranco Transcription - 19 May
>>>> 2014
>>>> To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Rafik,
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>> I wanted to let you know that on our call today, CSG concluded that we
>>>> cannot support Sam as a Board candidate at this time.  We are
>>>> continuing to explore further options for moving forward.  I will let
>>>> you know as soon as we have something further to propose.
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>> Steve
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>> *From:*Rafik Dammak [mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>]
>>>> *Sent:* Saturday, May 24, 2014 9:56 PM
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *To:* Metalitz, Steven
>>>> *Subject:* Re: FW: CSG call with Sam Lanfranco Transcription - 19
>>>> May 2014
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>> Thanks Steve, so we will wait then for the final decision.
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>> Rafik
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>> 2014-05-24 4:01 GMT+09:00 Metalitz, Steven <met at msk.com
>>>> <mailto:met at msk.com>>:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Rafik,
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>> We had a CSG leadership call on this today and are undertaking further
>>>> consultation within our constituencies on a couple of points.  We are
>>>> to meet again next Friday.
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>> Steve
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>> *From:*Rafik Dammak [mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>]
>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 20, 2014 8:56 PM
>>>> *To:* Metalitz, Steven
>>>> *Subject:* Re: FW: CSG call with Sam Lanfranco Transcription - 19
>>>> May 2014
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>> Hi Steve,
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>> is it possible to know when CSG will respond to us about Sam
>>>> candidature?
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Rafik
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>> 2014-05-21 9:53 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Steve,
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>> Rafik
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>> 2014-05-21 4:36 GMT+09:00 Metalitz, Steven <met at msk.com
>>>> <mailto:met at msk.com>>:
>>>>
>>>>      
>>>>      Rafik,
>>>>
>>>>      For circulation to NCSG.
>>>>
>>>>      Steve
>>>>
>>>>      -----Original Message-----
>>>>      From: Nathalie Peregrine [mailto:nathalie.peregrine at icann.org
>>>>      <mailto:nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>]
>>>>      Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 8:48 AM
>>>>      To: Rosette, Kristina; Metalitz, Steven; tony holmes
>>>>      (tonyarholmes at btinternet.com
>>>>      <mailto:tonyarholmes at btinternet.com>); Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
>>>>      (Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de
>>>>      <mailto:Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de>);
>>>>      Elisa.Cooper at markmonitor.com
>>>>      <mailto:Elisa.Cooper at markmonitor.com>; marilynscade at hotmail.com
>>>>      <mailto:marilynscade at hotmail.com>; harris at cabase.org.ar
>>>>      <mailto:harris at cabase.org.ar>
>>>>      Cc: gnso-secs at icann.org <mailto:gnso-secs at icann.org>
>>>>      Subject: CSG call with Sam Lanfranco Transcription - 19 May 2014
>>>>
>>>>      Dear all,
>>>>
>>>>      Please find attached the transcript of the CSG call held with Sam
>>>>      Lanfranco on May 19th 2014.
>>>>
>>>>      Kind regards
>>>>
>>>>      Nathalie
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
> 
> 
> 