[PC-NCSG] NCPH Board seat 14 election - results second round

Rafik Dammak rafik.dammak
Tue Apr 29 23:40:20 EEST 2014


Hi Rudi,

I resumed the discussion with Kristina about the process after the
netmundial week and suggested our compromise candidate. CSG excom had call
before and discussed some options to be on or out (for example they decided
to not change the voting threshold of 8 votes), they didn't reach any
decision yet and now they have to check our own proposal.

we may have call early next week with CSG if it is OK and we will be able
to defend our option and listen to theirs. good to agree on some points
before the call .

btw the time is playing for our side,

Best

Rafik


2014-04-30 5:00 GMT+09:00 Rudi Vansnick <rudi.vansnick at isoc.be>:

> Dear Rafik,
>
> As I did not hear nor read any reaction of action on the process of
> putting forward our compromise candidate and time is flowing away, may I
> ask what?s next ? Did CSG already react ? What are the steps we officially
> need to go through now (asap) ?
>
> Kind regards,
>
>  Rudi Vansnick
> NPOC chair Policy Committee
> NPOC treasurer
> rudi.vansnick at npoc.org
> Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16
> Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32
> www.npoc.org
>
> Op 21-apr.-2014, om 13:54 heeft Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> Hi ,
>
> just to clarify, it is not a NCSG PC meeting we are talking about but a
> possible call between CSG and NCSG regarding the election. because
> netmundial, it may be complicated for those in brazil from CSG and NCSG to
> attend the call this week. it may be wise to have a call next week when
> everybody go back home. we are also hashing out the process here in PC
> list. Sam is our compromise candidate and we still need to discuss about
> the election process and find out CSG reaction to our proposal.
>
> @Avri thanks for the proposal, it looks for me a workable and clear way to
> improve election process.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> 2014-04-21 17:00 GMT+09:00 Rudi Vansnick <rudi.vansnick at isoc.be>:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> The decision to have a NCSG PC meeting is that not the responsibility of
>> the chair of the NCSG Policy Committee ? Maria, what about the call for a
>> meeting or a doodle ? Do you take action ?
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>>  Rudi Vansnick
>> NPOC chair Policy Committee
>> NPOC treasurer
>> rudi.vansnick at npoc.org
>> Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16
>> Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32
>> www.npoc.org
>>
>> Op 21-apr.-2014, om 08:22 heeft marie-laure Lemineur <
>> mllemineur at gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I know I am copied, but a silly question just to be sure, I am suppose to
>> be on this call or just the GNSO councillors  and Rafik and Maria as policy
>> Chair ? Just for clarification.
>>
>> ...Not going to Brazil thus I am available all week basically..
>>
>> best,
>>
>> ml
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everybody,
>>>
>>> I goy finally email from Kristina, she was asking if CSG and NCSG need
>>> confcall next week to discuss . since many of us will be in netmundial, it
>>> may be complicated. so please let me if you are ok or not to have such
>>> call. if we have such call, I think that is better to let them know about
>>> the compromise there.
>>> Kristina and me need to contact Jonathan too about the result , checking
>>> with John Jeffrey (the ICANN legal counsel)
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>>
>>> Rafik
>>>
>>> 2014-04-19 1:50 GMT+09:00 Magaly Pazello <magaly.pazello at gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> Hi!
>>>> It is my understand too, I mean what Maria explained and Rafik
>>>> observations about the CSG reactions.
>>>> Thank you our brave Avri!
>>>>
>>>> For whom is coming to NM have a smooth trip to S?o Paulo. And at the
>>>> airports take care with ATM machines as it is a paradise of credit/bank
>>>> account card fraud!
>>>>
>>>> Magaly
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Maria,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the summary,
>>>>> it is when we have deadlock that we can propose the compromise and
>>>>> having the ability to do so. and the only way to reach deadlock is at 3rd
>>>>> and final round .
>>>>> yes , we can follow the proposal: writing to the NCPH list to initiate
>>>>> the discussion regarding compromise candidates. and yes we cannot predict
>>>>> CSG reactions and we should be ready for that.
>>>>> I already indicated quickly to Kristina when I received the results
>>>>> that we should discuss but no reply yet. I think that is easter holidays
>>>>> this weekend and probably won't get answer quickly ( in addition to those
>>>>> who are travelling to Sao Paulo soon).
>>>>>
>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2014-04-18 0:57 GMT+09:00 Maria Farrell <maria.farrell at gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Marie Laure et al,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, just to be clear, we'd agreed in Singapore to let the thing go
>>>>>> to three rounds and if it was still deadlocked,i.e. an election clearly
>>>>>> wasn't going to yield a winning candidate, that NCSG would propose Sam to
>>>>>> the CSG as a compromise candidate both sides of the NCPH could agree on.
>>>>>> (at least we in the NCSG agree he would be a good candidate, and we hope
>>>>>> the CSG will agree, too) We didn't want to put Sam up against BIll in a
>>>>>> vote, but rather in the discussions we anticipated might ensue after the
>>>>>> vote proved inconclusive.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So I think there should be no scope for any disappointment just yet -
>>>>>> apart from the obvious disappointment that the NCSG's candidate didn't win
>>>>>> outright in three rounds of voting.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now we need to start the process of interacting with the CSG on a
>>>>>> compromise person to be agreed on by both sides of the NCPH, and we all
>>>>>> stand behind Sam as that person.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From here on in, we can't predict what the CSG will propose or how
>>>>>> they will react, so we will have to work very closely across the NCSG to
>>>>>> make sure we're all happy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let's be clear about precisely how we will take the next step. I
>>>>>> think we should write to the NCPH list and say basically 'there's no clear
>>>>>> outcome in the election, so shall we discuss compromise candidates?' and
>>>>>> if/when they agree, say we propose Sam.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How does that sound as a next step?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maria
>>>>>>
>>>>>> p.s. Thank you very, very much, Avri, for standing in the election on
>>>>>> behalf of the NCSG. It was fantastic that you secured the NCA vote, and a
>>>>>> shame the ISPs didn't come through. Tant pis!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 17 April 2014 16:39, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> While I disagree with your interpretation about what was agreed to, I
>>>>>>> appreciate you giving me the chance.  And I appreciate the fact that
>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>> of the votes held and I was able to at least get the majority vote.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And yes now is the time to propose Sam as the compromise.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Which means he replaces _both_ BillG and me and become a sole
>>>>>>> candidate
>>>>>>> in a election between Sam and none of the above.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That is what I think we agreed to.  And I am pretty sure the record
>>>>>>> shows that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> avri
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 17-Apr-14 11:13, Marie-laure Lemineur wrote:
>>>>>>> > Dear NCSG-PC members,
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > The results of the third round were just released.  This third
>>>>>>> round
>>>>>>> > ended in a deadlock therefore, as agreed in Singapore, NCSG though
>>>>>>> its
>>>>>>> > leadership should proposed Sam as the compromise candidate. Just in
>>>>>>> > fairness to history and for the record, in Singapore we had agreed
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> > we would wait for two rounds and if a deadlock happened, Sam would
>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>> > proposed as a candidate for the third round. But despite that, in
>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>> > to give Avri another opportunity and as a proof of good faith, we (
>>>>>>> > NPOC) waited for the results of the third round to happen. Now,
>>>>>>> that it
>>>>>>> > has happened, and we are going for a fourth round, the fair thing
>>>>>>> to do
>>>>>>> > is to that respect the terms of our deal despite the
>>>>>>> disappointment that
>>>>>>> > many can feel.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Best,
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Marie-laure
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Enviado desde mi iPad
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > El 14/04/2014, a las 10:29 p.m., Rudi Vansnick <
>>>>>>> rudi.vansnick at isoc.be
>>>>>>> > <mailto:rudi.vansnick at isoc.be>> escribi?:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >> Dear Policy Committee members,
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> As the chair of the NPOC PC, after consulting with the committee
>>>>>>> >> members, I agree we proceed as is stated in Avri?s mail. We go
>>>>>>> for the
>>>>>>> >> 3rd round and if the deadlock happens we proceed with Sam
>>>>>>> Lanfranco as
>>>>>>> >> the compromise candidate.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Kind regards,
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Rudi Vansnick
>>>>>>> >> NPOC chair Policy Committee
>>>>>>> >> NPOC treasurer
>>>>>>> >> rudi.vansnick at npoc.org <mailto:rudi.vansnick at npoc.org>
>>>>>>> >> Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16
>>>>>>> >> Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32
>>>>>>> >> www.npoc.org <http://www.npoc.org>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Op 14-apr.-2014, om 17:06 heeft Avri Doria <avri at acm.org
>>>>>>> >> <mailto:avri at acm.org>> het volgende geschreven:
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >>> Hi,
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> I hope we are still giving me the third round to see what
>>>>>>> happens.
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> If no one wins the 60% in this vote, then we are in the deadlock
>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>> >>> spoke of when Sam is proposed as the compromise candidate.
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> Or at least that is what I thought we agreed to.
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> thanks
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> avri
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> On 14-Apr-14 02:47, marie-laure Lemineur wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>> Dear Rafik,
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> I would like to call for an NCSG policy meeting  soonest in
>>>>>>> order to
>>>>>>> >>>> formally nominate Sam as a candidate for the next round.
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> Best,
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> Marie-laure
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:18 AM, marie-laure Lemineur
>>>>>>> >>>> <mllemineur at gmail.com <mailto:mllemineur at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> >>>> <mailto:mllemineur at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>    Hi all,
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>    I assume that what we agreed on during our NCSG policy
>>>>>>> meeting in
>>>>>>> >>>>    Singapore, for the third round, is still on...
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>    best,
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>    ml
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>    On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 4:59 PM, William Drake <
>>>>>>> wjdrake at gmail.com
>>>>>>> >>>> <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> >>>>    <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>        Mikey is the key.
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>        On Apr 12, 2014, at 6:33 PM, Robin Gross <
>>>>>>> robin at ipjustice.org
>>>>>>> >>>> <mailto:robin at ipjustice.org>
>>>>>>> >>>>        <mailto:robin at ipjustice.org>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>        This is really great!  Way to go Avri!  Keep it up,
>>>>>>> team!!
>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>        Best,
>>>>>>> >>>>>        Robin
>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>        On Apr 12, 2014, at 4:39 AM, Amr Elsadr wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>        Heeey!! Looks like Avri picked up the NCA vote this
>>>>>>> round!! :)
>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>        Nice.
>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>        On Apr 12, 2014, at 12:17 PM, Rafik Dammak
>>>>>>> >>>>>>        <rafik.dammak at gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >>>>>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        Hi ,
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        The result of 2nd round, we are going to have a 3rd
>>>>>>> round.
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        Best,
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        Rafik
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        From: "Glen de Saint G?ry" <Glen at icann.org
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Glen at icann.org>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        <mailto:Glen at icann.org>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        Date: Apr 12, 2014 4:03 PM
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        Subject: NCPH Board seat 14 election - results second
>>>>>>> round
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        To: "krosette at cov.com <mailto:krosette at cov.com>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:krosette at cov.com>"
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        <krosette at cov.com <mailto:krosette at cov.com>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:krosette at cov.com>>,
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        "rafik.dammak at gmail.com <mailto:
>>>>>>> rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>"
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        <rafik.dammak at gmail.com <mailto:
>>>>>>> rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        Cc: "Glen de Saint G?ry" <Glen at icann.org
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Glen at icann.org>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        <mailto:Glen at icann.org>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        __ __
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        Dear Kristina and Rafik,____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        __ __
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        Please find the results of the second round of voting
>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        closed on Friday, 11 April at 23:59 UTC.
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        Final tally :____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        *__ __*
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          7 votes     Avri Doria____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          6 votes     Bill Graham____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          0 vote      None of the above____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        __ __
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        We await your instructions to continue with the third
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> round of voting due to open at 07:00UTC on 14 April 2014 and
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> close on 16 April at 23:59 UTC.  Please provide us with the
>>>>>>> text
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> for the ballot and any covering note that has to be sent
>>>>>>> with the
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> vote.____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        __ __
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        Thank you.____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        Kind regards,____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        __ __
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        Glen____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        *__ __*
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        *Machine tally:
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        **Total Ballots Cast (including duplicates):*13
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        *Ballots Counted (excluding duplicates):* 13
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        *Voters Who Haven't Voted:* 0 *____*
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        *Ballot with added tally (using weights, if any):*____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>                        Select just one of the nominees
>>>>>>> below____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        1:  7 votes    [] Avri Doria____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        2:  6 votes    [] Bill Graham____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        3:  0 votes    [] None of the above____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        *__ __*
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        *Ballots Received:*____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        __ __
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        Ballot ID 1dd5b4c740cea13  Received at 2014-04-11
>>>>>>> 16:49:17
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          1: [ ]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          2: [X]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          3: [ ]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        __ __
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        Ballot ID 1a1b25296676fb1  Received at 2014-04-11
>>>>>>> 15:28:42
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          1: [ ]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          2: [X]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          3: [ ]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        __ __
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        Ballot ID 4c958b0a504c620   Received at 2014-04-10
>>>>>>> 13:40:01
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          1: [ ]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          2: [X]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          3: [ ]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        __ __
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        Ballot ID ad2820176335eb9  Received at 2014-04-10
>>>>>>> 13:08:07
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          1: [X]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          2: [ ]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          3: [ ]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        __ __
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        Ballot ID a1f76553370d1a0  Received at 2014-04-10
>>>>>>> 09:26:14
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          1: [X]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          2: [ ]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          3: [ ]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        __ __
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        Ballot ID fe7ceebe542d573  Received at 2014-04-08
>>>>>>> 16:52:25
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          1: [ ]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          2: [X]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          3: [ ]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        __ __
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        Ballot ID 38e81b64ae7b939  Received at 2014-04-08
>>>>>>> 15:57:41
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          1: [ ]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          2: [X]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          3: [ ]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        __ __
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        Ballot ID b38aaa35f39640a  Received at 2014-04-08
>>>>>>> 13:35:34
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          1: [ ]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          2: [X]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          3: [ ]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        __ __
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        Ballot ID 7b27a78001e9a0e  Received at 2014-04-08
>>>>>>> 11:39:05
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          1: [X]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          2: [ ]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          3: [ ]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        __ __
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        Ballot ID 4b5a67b6bf8b080  Received at 2014-04-08
>>>>>>> 11:31:12
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          1: [X]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          2: [ ]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          3: [ ]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        __ __
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        Ballot ID 56805a16c3eee62  Received at 2014-04-08
>>>>>>> 09:48:11
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          1: [X]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          2: [ ]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          3: [ ]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        __ __
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        Ballot ID a5658498dd4faf6  Received at 2014-04-08
>>>>>>> 08:41:13
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          1: [X]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          2: [ ]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          3: [ ]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        __ __
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        Ballot ID 149c308cf7d49b7  Received at 2014-04-08
>>>>>>> 06:59:36
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          1: [X]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          2: [ ]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>          3: [ ]____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        __ __
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        __ __
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        Glen de Saint G?ry ____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        GNSO Secretariat ____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        <mailto:gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org> ____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        http://gnso.icann.org <http://gnso.icann.org/>____
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        __ __
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>        http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>        _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> >>>>>>        PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>>> >>>>>>        PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>>>> >>>>>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>        http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>        _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> >>>>>        PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>>> >>>>>        PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>>>> >>>>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>>>> >>>>>        http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>        ***********************************************
>>>>>>> >>>>        William J. Drake
>>>>>>> >>>>        International Fellow & Lecturer
>>>>>>> >>>>          Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
>>>>>>> >>>>          University of Zurich, Switzerland
>>>>>>> >>>>        Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency,
>>>>>>> >>>>          ICANN, www.ncuc.org <http://www.ncuc.org> <
>>>>>>> http://www.ncuc.org>
>>>>>>> >>>>        william.drake at uzh.ch <mailto:william.drake at uzh.ch>
>>>>>>> >>>>        <mailto:william.drake at uzh.ch> (direct),
>>>>>>> wjdrake at gmail.com
>>>>>>> >>>> <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> >>>>        <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com> (lists),
>>>>>>> >>>>          www.williamdrake.org <http://www.williamdrake.org>
>>>>>>> >>>> <http://www.williamdrake.org>
>>>>>>> >>>>        ***********************************************
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>        _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> >>>>        PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>>> >>>>        PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>>>> >>>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>>>> >>>>        http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> >>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>>> >>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>>>> >>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> >>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>>> >>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>>>> >>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> >> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>>> >> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>>>> >> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>>>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20140430/2d8481fa/attachment-0001.html>



More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list