[PC-NCSG] NCPH Board seat 14 election - results second round

Amr Elsadr aelsadr
Sun Apr 20 17:50:06 EEST 2014


That would be even better. :)

Thanks.

Amr

On Apr 19, 2014, at 3:10 PM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Well, as a compromise candidate, perhaps we should suggest that we talk
> to Sam together as a house.
> 
> avri
> 
> 
> 
> On 19-Apr-14 07:29, Amr Elsadr wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I would like to be on this call if it takes place, but recommend that it
>> be postponed (even for a few days) if it won?t be populated well because
>> of NM conflicts.
>> 
>> In terms of what we should discuss; we should certainly present Sam as a
>> compromise candidate as an item to be followed up on. I?m sure the CSG
>> will want to talk to him, like they did Avri as well as David when we
>> proposed him as a GNSO Council VC.
>> 
>> We should also start discussions with them on the broken voting
>> mechanism. We need a serious discussion with them on this, and figure
>> out ways to remedy it. If the discussion starts well on a call, it can
>> be followed up on the NCPH list afterwards.
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> Amr
>> 
>> On Apr 19, 2014, at 1:05 PM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org
>> <mailto:avri at acm.org>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I am fine with a confcall as long as it does not interfere with any of
>>> the NetMundial or other activities of next week.
>>> 
>>> What do we hope to achieve?  If it is just presenting them with the
>>> compromise, I suggest you just do that, and let them chew on it for a
>>> bit before any confcall.  Let Sam and others try and convince them that
>>> he is middle of the road enough and business friendly enough for them to
>>> accept.  That is their issue, they insist on someone who is business
>>> friendly.  If Sam can prove he is business friendly and will vote their
>>> way on things, he can be on the Board.
>>> 
>>> The one thing I want to make sure we put forward:  I may not have won,
>>> but Bill G. lost, twice, and is _out_.  Theoretically what should be the
>>> process for whatever number of candidates, if that a candidate that
>>> loses is dropped out, and the remaining, even if just one, runs against
>>> NOTA.  But I support our continuing with our compromise proposal of Sam
>>> vs. NOTA.
>>> 
>>> avri
>>> 
>>> On 19-Apr-14 05:14, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>>> Hi everybody,
>>>> 
>>>> I goy finally email from Kristina, she was asking if CSG and NCSG need
>>>> confcall next week to discuss . since many of us will be in netmundial,
>>>> it may be complicated. so please let me if you are ok or not to have
>>>> such call. if we have such call, I think that is better to let them know
>>>> about the compromise there.
>>>> Kristina and me need to contact Jonathan too about the result , checking
>>>> with John Jeffrey (the ICANN legal counsel)
>>>> 
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> 
>>>> Rafik 
>>>> 
>>>> 2014-04-19 1:50 GMT+09:00 Magaly Pazello <magaly.pazello at gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:magaly.pazello at gmail.com>
>>>> <mailto:magaly.pazello at gmail.com>>:
>>>> 
>>>>   Hi!
>>>>   It is my understand too, I mean what Maria explained and Rafik
>>>>   observations about the CSG reactions.
>>>>   Thank you our brave Avri!
>>>> 
>>>>   For whom is coming to NM have a smooth trip to S?o Paulo. And at the
>>>>   airports take care with ATM machines as it is a paradise of
>>>>   credit/bank account card fraud!
>>>> 
>>>>   Magaly
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>   On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Rafik Dammak
>>>>   <rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>       Hi Maria,
>>>> 
>>>>       Thanks for the summary,
>>>>       it is when we have deadlock that we can propose the compromise
>>>>       and having the ability to do so. and the only way to reach
>>>>       deadlock is at 3rd and final round .
>>>>       yes , we can follow the proposal: writing to the NCPH list to
>>>>       initiate the discussion regarding compromise candidates. and yes
>>>>       we cannot predict CSG reactions and we should be ready for that.
>>>>       I already indicated quickly to Kristina when I received the
>>>>       results that we should discuss but no reply yet. I think that is
>>>>       easter holidays this weekend and probably won't get answer
>>>>       quickly ( in addition to those who are travelling to Sao Paulo
>>>>       soon). 
>>>> 
>>>>       Best Regards,
>>>> 
>>>>       Rafik 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>       2014-04-18 0:57 GMT+09:00 Maria Farrell
>>>> <maria.farrell at gmail.com <mailto:maria.farrell at gmail.com>
>>>>       <mailto:maria.farrell at gmail.com>>:
>>>> 
>>>>           Hi Marie Laure et al,
>>>> 
>>>>           Yes, just to be clear, we'd agreed in Singapore to let the
>>>>           thing go to three rounds and if it was still deadlocked,i.e.
>>>>           an election clearly wasn't going to yield a winning
>>>>           candidate, that NCSG would propose Sam to the CSG as a
>>>>           compromise candidate both sides of the NCPH could agree on.
>>>>           (at least we in the NCSG agree he would be a good candidate,
>>>>           and we hope the CSG will agree, too) We didn't want to put
>>>>           Sam up against BIll in a vote, but rather in the discussions
>>>>           we anticipated might ensue after the vote proved inconclusive.
>>>> 
>>>>           So I think there should be no scope for any disappointment
>>>>           just yet - apart from the obvious disappointment that the
>>>>           NCSG's candidate didn't win outright in three rounds of
>>>> voting.
>>>> 
>>>>           Now we need to start the process of interacting with the CSG
>>>>           on a compromise person to be agreed on by both sides of the
>>>>           NCPH, and we all stand behind Sam as that person.
>>>> 
>>>>           From here on in, we can't predict what the CSG will propose
>>>>           or how they will react, so we will have to work very closely
>>>>           across the NCSG to make sure we're all happy. 
>>>> 
>>>>           Let's be clear about precisely how we will take the next
>>>>           step. I think we should write to the NCPH list and say
>>>>           basically 'there's no clear outcome in the election, so
>>>>           shall we discuss compromise candidates?' and if/when they
>>>>           agree, say we propose Sam.
>>>> 
>>>>           How does that sound as a next step?
>>>> 
>>>>           Maria
>>>> 
>>>>           p.s. Thank you very, very much, Avri, for standing in the
>>>>           election on behalf of the NCSG. It was fantastic that you
>>>>           secured the NCA vote, and a shame the ISPs didn't come
>>>>           through. Tant pis!
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>           On 17 April 2014 16:39, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org
>>>> <mailto:avri at acm.org>
>>>>           <mailto:avri at acm.org>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>               Hi,
>>>> 
>>>>               While I disagree with your interpretation about what was
>>>>               agreed to, I
>>>>               appreciate you giving me the chance.  And I appreciate
>>>>               the fact that all
>>>>               of the votes held and I was able to at least get the
>>>>               majority vote.
>>>> 
>>>>               And yes now is the time to propose Sam as the compromise.
>>>> 
>>>>               Which means he replaces _both_ BillG and me and become a
>>>>               sole candidate
>>>>               in a election between Sam and none of the above.
>>>> 
>>>>               That is what I think we agreed to.  And I am pretty sure
>>>>               the record
>>>>               shows that.
>>>> 
>>>>               avri
>>>> 
>>>>               On 17-Apr-14 11:13, Marie-laure Lemineur wrote:
>>>>> Dear NCSG-PC members,
>>>>> 
>>>>> The results of the third round were just released.
>>>>                This third round
>>>>> ended in a deadlock therefore, as agreed in Singapore,
>>>>               NCSG though its
>>>>> leadership should proposed Sam as the compromise
>>>>               candidate. Just in
>>>>> fairness to history and for the record, in Singapore
>>>>               we had agreed that
>>>>> we would wait for two rounds and if a deadlock
>>>>               happened, Sam would be
>>>>> proposed as a candidate for the third round. But
>>>>               despite that, in order
>>>>> to give Avri another opportunity and as a proof of
>>>>               good faith, we (
>>>>> NPOC) waited for the results of the third round to
>>>>               happen. Now, that it
>>>>> has happened, and we are going for a fourth round, the
>>>>               fair thing to do
>>>>> is to that respect the terms of our deal despite the
>>>>               disappointment that
>>>>> many can feel.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Marie-laure
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Enviado desde mi iPad
>>>>> 
>>>>> El 14/04/2014, a las 10:29 p.m., Rudi Vansnick
>>>>               <rudi.vansnick at isoc.be
>>>> <mailto:rudi.vansnick at isoc.be> <mailto:rudi.vansnick at isoc.be>
>>>>> <mailto:rudi.vansnick at isoc.be
>>>>               <mailto:rudi.vansnick at isoc.be>>> escribi?:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Dear Policy Committee members,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> As the chair of the NPOC PC, after consulting with
>>>>               the committee
>>>>>> members, I agree we proceed as is stated in Avri?s
>>>>               mail. We go for the
>>>>>> 3rd round and if the deadlock happens we proceed with
>>>>               Sam Lanfranco as
>>>>>> the compromise candidate.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Rudi Vansnick
>>>>>> NPOC chair Policy Committee
>>>>>> NPOC treasurer
>>>>>> rudi.vansnick at npoc.org <mailto:rudi.vansnick at npoc.org>
>>>>               <mailto:rudi.vansnick at npoc.org>
>>>>               <mailto:rudi.vansnick at npoc.org
>>>>               <mailto:rudi.vansnick at npoc.org>>
>>>>>> Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16
>>>>               <tel:%2B32%20%280%299%20329%2039%2016>
>>>>>> Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32
>>>>               <tel:%2B32%20%280%29475%2028%2016%2032>
>>>>>> www.npoc.org <http://www.npoc.org/> <http://www.npoc.org
>>>>>> <http://www.npoc.org/>> <http://www.npoc.org <http://www.npoc.org/>>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Op 14-apr.-2014, om 17:06 heeft Avri Doria
>>>>               <avri at acm.org <mailto:avri at acm.org> <mailto:avri at acm.org>
>>>>>> <mailto:avri at acm.org <mailto:avri at acm.org>>> het
>>>>               volgende geschreven:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I hope we are still giving me the third round to see
>>>>               what happens.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> If no one wins the 60% in this vote, then we are in
>>>>               the deadlock we
>>>>>>> spoke of when Sam is proposed as the compromise
>>>>               candidate.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Or at least that is what I thought we agreed to.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> avri
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 14-Apr-14 02:47, marie-laure Lemineur wrote:
>>>>>>>> Dear Rafik,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I would like to call for an NCSG policy meeting
>>>>                soonest in order to
>>>>>>>> formally nominate Sam as a candidate for the next
>>>>               round.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Marie-laure
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:18 AM, marie-laure Lemineur
>>>>>>>> <mllemineur at gmail.com
>>>>>>>> <mailto:mllemineur at gmail.com> <mailto:mllemineur at gmail.com>
>>>>               <mailto:mllemineur at gmail.com <mailto:mllemineur at gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>> <mailto:mllemineur at gmail.com
>>>>               <mailto:mllemineur at gmail.com>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>  Hi all,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>  I assume that what we agreed on during our NCSG
>>>>               policy meeting in
>>>>>>>>  Singapore, for the third round, is still on...
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>  best,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>  ml
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>  On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 4:59 PM, William Drake
>>>>               <wjdrake at gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com> <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>>  <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com
>>>>               <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>      Mikey is the key.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>      On Apr 12, 2014, at 6:33 PM, Robin Gross
>>>>               <robin at ipjustice.org
>>>> <mailto:robin at ipjustice.org> <mailto:robin at ipjustice.org>
>>>>>>>> <mailto:robin at ipjustice.org
>>>>               <mailto:robin at ipjustice.org>>
>>>>>>>>      <mailto:robin at ipjustice.org
>>>>               <mailto:robin at ipjustice.org>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>      This is really great!  Way to go Avri!
>>>>                Keep it up, team!!
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>      Best,
>>>>>>>>>      Robin
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>      On Apr 12, 2014, at 4:39 AM, Amr Elsadr wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>      Heeey!! Looks like Avri picked up the NCA
>>>>               vote this round!! :)
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>      Nice.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>      On Apr 12, 2014, at 12:17 PM, Rafik Dammak
>>>>>>>>>>      <rafik.dammak at gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>>>               <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>>>               <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>>>>               <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>>>>               <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      Hi ,
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      The result of 2nd round, we are going to
>>>>               have a 3rd round.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      Best,
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      Rafik
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>>>>>>>      From: "Glen de Saint G?ry"
>>>>               <Glen at icann.org
>>>> <mailto:Glen at icann.org> <mailto:Glen at icann.org>
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:Glen at icann.org <mailto:Glen at icann.org>>
>>>>>>>>>>>      <mailto:Glen at icann.org
>>>>               <mailto:Glen at icann.org>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>      Date: Apr 12, 2014 4:03 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>      Subject: NCPH Board seat 14 election -
>>>>               results second round
>>>>>>>>>>>      To: "krosette at cov.com <mailto:krosette at cov.com>
>>>>               <mailto:krosette at cov.com> <mailto:krosette at cov.com
>>>>               <mailto:krosette at cov.com>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:krosette at cov.com <mailto:krosette at cov.com>>"
>>>>>>>>>>>      <krosette at cov.com <mailto:krosette at cov.com>
>>>>               <mailto:krosette at cov.com> <mailto:krosette at cov.com
>>>>               <mailto:krosette at cov.com>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:krosette at cov.com
>>>>               <mailto:krosette at cov.com>>>,
>>>>>>>>>>>      "rafik.dammak at gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>>>               <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>>>               <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>>>>               <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>>>>               <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>"
>>>>>>>>>>>      <rafik.dammak at gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>>>               <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>>>               <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>>>>               <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>>>>               <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>      Cc: "Glen de Saint G?ry" <Glen at icann.org
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:Glen at icann.org>
>>>>               <mailto:Glen at icann.org>
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:Glen at icann.org <mailto:Glen at icann.org>>
>>>>>>>>>>>      <mailto:Glen at icann.org
>>>>               <mailto:Glen at icann.org>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      __ __
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      Dear Kristina and Rafik,____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      __ __
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      Please find the results of the second
>>>>               round of voting which
>>>>>>>>>>>      closed on Friday, 11 April at 23:59 UTC.
>>>>>>>>>>>      Final tally :____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      *__ __*
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        7 votes     Avri Doria____
>>>>>>>>>>>        6 votes     Bill Graham____
>>>>>>>>>>>        0 vote      None of the above____
>>>>>>>>>>>      __ __
>>>>>>>>>>>      We await your instructions to continue
>>>>               with the third
>>>>>>>>>>> round of voting due to open at 07:00UTC on 14
>>>>               April 2014 and
>>>>>>>>>>> close on 16 April at 23:59 UTC.  Please provide
>>>>               us with the text
>>>>>>>>>>> for the ballot and any covering note that has to
>>>>               be sent with the
>>>>>>>>>>> vote.____
>>>>>>>>>>>      __ __
>>>>>>>>>>>      Thank you.____
>>>>>>>>>>>      Kind regards,____
>>>>>>>>>>>      __ __
>>>>>>>>>>>      Glen____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      *__ __*
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      *Machine tally:
>>>>>>>>>>>      **Total Ballots Cast (including
>>>>               duplicates):*13
>>>>>>>>>>>      *Ballots Counted (excluding duplicates):* 13
>>>>>>>>>>>      *Voters Who Haven't Voted:* 0 *____*
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      *Ballot with added tally (using weights,
>>>>               if any):*____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>                      Select just one of the
>>>>               nominees below____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      1:  7 votes    [] Avri Doria____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      2:  6 votes    [] Bill Graham____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      3:  0 votes    [] None of the above____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      *__ __*
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      *Ballots Received:*____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      __ __
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      Ballot ID 1dd5b4c740cea13  Received at
>>>>               2014-04-11 16:49:17
>>>>>>>>>>>      UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        1: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        2: [X]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        3: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      __ __
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      Ballot ID 1a1b25296676fb1  Received at
>>>>               2014-04-11 15:28:42
>>>>>>>>>>>      UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        1: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        2: [X]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        3: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      __ __
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      Ballot ID 4c958b0a504c620   Received at
>>>>               2014-04-10 13:40:01
>>>>>>>>>>>      UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        1: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        2: [X]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        3: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      __ __
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      Ballot ID ad2820176335eb9  Received at
>>>>               2014-04-10 13:08:07
>>>>>>>>>>>      UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        1: [X]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        2: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        3: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      __ __
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      Ballot ID a1f76553370d1a0  Received at
>>>>               2014-04-10 09:26:14
>>>>>>>>>>>      UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        1: [X]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        2: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        3: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      __ __
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      Ballot ID fe7ceebe542d573  Received at
>>>>               2014-04-08 16:52:25
>>>>>>>>>>>      UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        1: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        2: [X]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        3: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      __ __
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      Ballot ID 38e81b64ae7b939  Received at
>>>>               2014-04-08 15:57:41
>>>>>>>>>>>      UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        1: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        2: [X]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        3: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      __ __
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      Ballot ID b38aaa35f39640a  Received at
>>>>               2014-04-08 13:35:34
>>>>>>>>>>>      UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        1: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        2: [X]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        3: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      __ __
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      Ballot ID 7b27a78001e9a0e  Received at
>>>>               2014-04-08 11:39:05
>>>>>>>>>>>      UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        1: [X]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        2: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        3: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      __ __
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      Ballot ID 4b5a67b6bf8b080  Received at
>>>>               2014-04-08 11:31:12
>>>>>>>>>>>      UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        1: [X]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        2: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        3: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      __ __
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      Ballot ID 56805a16c3eee62  Received at
>>>>               2014-04-08 09:48:11
>>>>>>>>>>>      UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        1: [X]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        2: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        3: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      __ __
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      Ballot ID a5658498dd4faf6  Received at
>>>>               2014-04-08 08:41:13
>>>>>>>>>>>      UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        1: [X]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        2: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        3: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      __ __
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      Ballot ID 149c308cf7d49b7  Received at
>>>>               2014-04-08 06:59:36
>>>>>>>>>>>      UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        1: [X]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        2: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        3: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      __ __
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      __ __
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      Glen de Saint G?ry ____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      GNSO Secretariat ____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org>
>>>>               <mailto:gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org>
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
>>>>               <mailto:gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org>>
>>>>>>>>>>>      <mailto:gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
>>>>               <mailto:gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org>> ____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      http://gnso.icann.org <http://gnso.icann.org/>
>>>>               <http://gnso.icann.org/>____
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      __ __
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>                _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>      PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>      PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>               <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>               <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>>>               <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>>>               <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>>
>>>>>>>>>>>      http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>                _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>      PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>      PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>               <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>               <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>>>               <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>>
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>>>               <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>>
>>>>>>>>>>      http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>      _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>      PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>>>>>      PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>               <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>               <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>>>               <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>>
>>>>>>>>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>>>               <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>>
>>>>>>>>>      http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>      ***********************************************
>>>>>>>>      William J. Drake
>>>>>>>>      International Fellow & Lecturer
>>>>>>>>        Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
>>>>>>>>        University of Zurich, Switzerland
>>>>>>>>      Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency,
>>>>>>>>        ICANN, www.ncuc.org
>>>>>>>> <http://www.ncuc.org/> <http://www.ncuc.org <http://www.ncuc.org/>>
>>>>               <http://www.ncuc.org <http://www.ncuc.org/>>
>>>> <http://www.ncuc.org <http://www.ncuc.org/>>
>>>>>>>>      william.drake at uzh.ch <mailto:william.drake at uzh.ch>
>>>>               <mailto:william.drake at uzh.ch>
>>>>               <mailto:william.drake at uzh.ch <mailto:william.drake at uzh.ch>>
>>>>>>>>      <mailto:william.drake at uzh.ch
>>>>               <mailto:william.drake at uzh.ch>> (direct),
>>>>               wjdrake at gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com> <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>>      <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com
>>>>               <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com>> (lists),
>>>>>>>>        www.williamdrake.org <http://www.williamdrake.org/>
>>>>               <http://www.williamdrake.org
>>>> <http://www.williamdrake.org/>> <http://www.williamdrake.org
>>>> <http://www.williamdrake.org/>>
>>>>>>>> <http://www.williamdrake.org <http://www.williamdrake.org/>>
>>>>>>>>      ***********************************************
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>      _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>      PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>>>>      PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>               <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>               <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>>>               <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>>
>>>>>>>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>>>               <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>>
>>>>>>>>      http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>               <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>               <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>>>               <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>>
>>>>>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>>>>>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>               <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>>>               <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>>
>>>>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>>>>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>               <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>>>               <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>>
>>>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>> 
>>>>               _______________________________________________
>>>>               PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>               PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>               http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>           _______________________________________________
>>>>           PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>           PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>           http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>       _______________________________________________
>>>>       PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>       PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>       http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20140420/d70a0e0a/attachment-0001.html>



More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list