[PC-NCSG] NCPH Board seat 14 election - results second round
Amr Elsadr
aelsadr
Sat Apr 19 14:29:15 EEST 2014
Hi,
I would like to be on this call if it takes place, but recommend that it be postponed (even for a few days) if it won?t be populated well because of NM conflicts.
In terms of what we should discuss; we should certainly present Sam as a compromise candidate as an item to be followed up on. I?m sure the CSG will want to talk to him, like they did Avri as well as David when we proposed him as a GNSO Council VC.
We should also start discussions with them on the broken voting mechanism. We need a serious discussion with them on this, and figure out ways to remedy it. If the discussion starts well on a call, it can be followed up on the NCPH list afterwards.
Thanks.
Amr
On Apr 19, 2014, at 1:05 PM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am fine with a confcall as long as it does not interfere with any of
> the NetMundial or other activities of next week.
>
> What do we hope to achieve? If it is just presenting them with the
> compromise, I suggest you just do that, and let them chew on it for a
> bit before any confcall. Let Sam and others try and convince them that
> he is middle of the road enough and business friendly enough for them to
> accept. That is their issue, they insist on someone who is business
> friendly. If Sam can prove he is business friendly and will vote their
> way on things, he can be on the Board.
>
> The one thing I want to make sure we put forward: I may not have won,
> but Bill G. lost, twice, and is _out_. Theoretically what should be the
> process for whatever number of candidates, if that a candidate that
> loses is dropped out, and the remaining, even if just one, runs against
> NOTA. But I support our continuing with our compromise proposal of Sam
> vs. NOTA.
>
> avri
>
> On 19-Apr-14 05:14, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> I goy finally email from Kristina, she was asking if CSG and NCSG need
>> confcall next week to discuss . since many of us will be in netmundial,
>> it may be complicated. so please let me if you are ok or not to have
>> such call. if we have such call, I think that is better to let them know
>> about the compromise there.
>> Kristina and me need to contact Jonathan too about the result , checking
>> with John Jeffrey (the ICANN legal counsel)
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> 2014-04-19 1:50 GMT+09:00 Magaly Pazello <magaly.pazello at gmail.com
>> <mailto:magaly.pazello at gmail.com>>:
>>
>> Hi!
>> It is my understand too, I mean what Maria explained and Rafik
>> observations about the CSG reactions.
>> Thank you our brave Avri!
>>
>> For whom is coming to NM have a smooth trip to S?o Paulo. And at the
>> airports take care with ATM machines as it is a paradise of
>> credit/bank account card fraud!
>>
>> Magaly
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Rafik Dammak
>> <rafik.dammak at gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Maria,
>>
>> Thanks for the summary,
>> it is when we have deadlock that we can propose the compromise
>> and having the ability to do so. and the only way to reach
>> deadlock is at 3rd and final round .
>> yes , we can follow the proposal: writing to the NCPH list to
>> initiate the discussion regarding compromise candidates. and yes
>> we cannot predict CSG reactions and we should be ready for that.
>> I already indicated quickly to Kristina when I received the
>> results that we should discuss but no reply yet. I think that is
>> easter holidays this weekend and probably won't get answer
>> quickly ( in addition to those who are travelling to Sao Paulo
>> soon).
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>>
>> 2014-04-18 0:57 GMT+09:00 Maria Farrell <maria.farrell at gmail.com
>> <mailto:maria.farrell at gmail.com>>:
>>
>> Hi Marie Laure et al,
>>
>> Yes, just to be clear, we'd agreed in Singapore to let the
>> thing go to three rounds and if it was still deadlocked,i.e.
>> an election clearly wasn't going to yield a winning
>> candidate, that NCSG would propose Sam to the CSG as a
>> compromise candidate both sides of the NCPH could agree on.
>> (at least we in the NCSG agree he would be a good candidate,
>> and we hope the CSG will agree, too) We didn't want to put
>> Sam up against BIll in a vote, but rather in the discussions
>> we anticipated might ensue after the vote proved inconclusive.
>>
>> So I think there should be no scope for any disappointment
>> just yet - apart from the obvious disappointment that the
>> NCSG's candidate didn't win outright in three rounds of voting.
>>
>> Now we need to start the process of interacting with the CSG
>> on a compromise person to be agreed on by both sides of the
>> NCPH, and we all stand behind Sam as that person.
>>
>> From here on in, we can't predict what the CSG will propose
>> or how they will react, so we will have to work very closely
>> across the NCSG to make sure we're all happy.
>>
>> Let's be clear about precisely how we will take the next
>> step. I think we should write to the NCPH list and say
>> basically 'there's no clear outcome in the election, so
>> shall we discuss compromise candidates?' and if/when they
>> agree, say we propose Sam.
>>
>> How does that sound as a next step?
>>
>> Maria
>>
>> p.s. Thank you very, very much, Avri, for standing in the
>> election on behalf of the NCSG. It was fantastic that you
>> secured the NCA vote, and a shame the ISPs didn't come
>> through. Tant pis!
>>
>>
>> On 17 April 2014 16:39, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org
>> <mailto:avri at acm.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> While I disagree with your interpretation about what was
>> agreed to, I
>> appreciate you giving me the chance. And I appreciate
>> the fact that all
>> of the votes held and I was able to at least get the
>> majority vote.
>>
>> And yes now is the time to propose Sam as the compromise.
>>
>> Which means he replaces _both_ BillG and me and become a
>> sole candidate
>> in a election between Sam and none of the above.
>>
>> That is what I think we agreed to. And I am pretty sure
>> the record
>> shows that.
>>
>> avri
>>
>> On 17-Apr-14 11:13, Marie-laure Lemineur wrote:
>>> Dear NCSG-PC members,
>>>
>>> The results of the third round were just released.
>> This third round
>>> ended in a deadlock therefore, as agreed in Singapore,
>> NCSG though its
>>> leadership should proposed Sam as the compromise
>> candidate. Just in
>>> fairness to history and for the record, in Singapore
>> we had agreed that
>>> we would wait for two rounds and if a deadlock
>> happened, Sam would be
>>> proposed as a candidate for the third round. But
>> despite that, in order
>>> to give Avri another opportunity and as a proof of
>> good faith, we (
>>> NPOC) waited for the results of the third round to
>> happen. Now, that it
>>> has happened, and we are going for a fourth round, the
>> fair thing to do
>>> is to that respect the terms of our deal despite the
>> disappointment that
>>> many can feel.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Marie-laure
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Enviado desde mi iPad
>>>
>>> El 14/04/2014, a las 10:29 p.m., Rudi Vansnick
>> <rudi.vansnick at isoc.be <mailto:rudi.vansnick at isoc.be>
>>> <mailto:rudi.vansnick at isoc.be
>> <mailto:rudi.vansnick at isoc.be>>> escribi?:
>>>
>>>> Dear Policy Committee members,
>>>>
>>>> As the chair of the NPOC PC, after consulting with
>> the committee
>>>> members, I agree we proceed as is stated in Avri?s
>> mail. We go for the
>>>> 3rd round and if the deadlock happens we proceed with
>> Sam Lanfranco as
>>>> the compromise candidate.
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>
>>>> Rudi Vansnick
>>>> NPOC chair Policy Committee
>>>> NPOC treasurer
>>>> rudi.vansnick at npoc.org
>> <mailto:rudi.vansnick at npoc.org>
>> <mailto:rudi.vansnick at npoc.org
>> <mailto:rudi.vansnick at npoc.org>>
>>>> Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16
>> <tel:%2B32%20%280%299%20329%2039%2016>
>>>> Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32
>> <tel:%2B32%20%280%29475%2028%2016%2032>
>>>> www.npoc.org <http://www.npoc.org> <http://www.npoc.org>
>>>>
>>>> Op 14-apr.-2014, om 17:06 heeft Avri Doria
>> <avri at acm.org <mailto:avri at acm.org>
>>>> <mailto:avri at acm.org <mailto:avri at acm.org>>> het
>> volgende geschreven:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I hope we are still giving me the third round to see
>> what happens.
>>>>>
>>>>> If no one wins the 60% in this vote, then we are in
>> the deadlock we
>>>>> spoke of when Sam is proposed as the compromise
>> candidate.
>>>>>
>>>>> Or at least that is what I thought we agreed to.
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> avri
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 14-Apr-14 02:47, marie-laure Lemineur wrote:
>>>>>> Dear Rafik,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to call for an NCSG policy meeting
>> soonest in order to
>>>>>> formally nominate Sam as a candidate for the next
>> round.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Marie-laure
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:18 AM, marie-laure Lemineur
>>>>>> <mllemineur at gmail.com <mailto:mllemineur at gmail.com>
>> <mailto:mllemineur at gmail.com <mailto:mllemineur at gmail.com>>
>>>>>> <mailto:mllemineur at gmail.com
>> <mailto:mllemineur at gmail.com>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I assume that what we agreed on during our NCSG
>> policy meeting in
>>>>>> Singapore, for the third round, is still on...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> best,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ml
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 4:59 PM, William Drake
>> <wjdrake at gmail.com <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com>
>>>>>> <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com>>
>>>>>> <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com
>> <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mikey is the key.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 12, 2014, at 6:33 PM, Robin Gross
>> <robin at ipjustice.org <mailto:robin at ipjustice.org>
>>>>>> <mailto:robin at ipjustice.org
>> <mailto:robin at ipjustice.org>>
>>>>>> <mailto:robin at ipjustice.org
>> <mailto:robin at ipjustice.org>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is really great! Way to go Avri!
>> Keep it up, team!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> Robin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Apr 12, 2014, at 4:39 AM, Amr Elsadr wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Heeey!! Looks like Avri picked up the NCA
>> vote this round!! :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nice.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Apr 12, 2014, at 12:17 PM, Rafik Dammak
>>>>>>>> <rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi ,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The result of 2nd round, we are going to
>> have a 3rd round.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>>>>> From: "Glen de Saint G?ry"
>> <Glen at icann.org <mailto:Glen at icann.org>
>>>>>>>>> <mailto:Glen at icann.org <mailto:Glen at icann.org>>
>>>>>>>>> <mailto:Glen at icann.org
>> <mailto:Glen at icann.org>>>
>>>>>>>>> Date: Apr 12, 2014 4:03 PM
>>>>>>>>> Subject: NCPH Board seat 14 election -
>> results second round
>>>>>>>>> To: "krosette at cov.com
>> <mailto:krosette at cov.com> <mailto:krosette at cov.com
>> <mailto:krosette at cov.com>>
>>>>>>>>> <mailto:krosette at cov.com <mailto:krosette at cov.com>>"
>>>>>>>>> <krosette at cov.com
>> <mailto:krosette at cov.com> <mailto:krosette at cov.com
>> <mailto:krosette at cov.com>>
>>>>>>>>> <mailto:krosette at cov.com
>> <mailto:krosette at cov.com>>>,
>>>>>>>>> "rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>"
>>>>>>>>> <rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cc: "Glen de Saint G?ry" <Glen at icann.org
>> <mailto:Glen at icann.org>
>>>>>>>>> <mailto:Glen at icann.org <mailto:Glen at icann.org>>
>>>>>>>>> <mailto:Glen at icann.org
>> <mailto:Glen at icann.org>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> __ __
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dear Kristina and Rafik,____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> __ __
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please find the results of the second
>> round of voting which
>>>>>>>>> closed on Friday, 11 April at 23:59 UTC.
>>>>>>>>> Final tally :____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *__ __*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 7 votes Avri Doria____
>>>>>>>>> 6 votes Bill Graham____
>>>>>>>>> 0 vote None of the above____
>>>>>>>>> __ __
>>>>>>>>> We await your instructions to continue
>> with the third
>>>>>>>>> round of voting due to open at 07:00UTC on 14
>> April 2014 and
>>>>>>>>> close on 16 April at 23:59 UTC. Please provide
>> us with the text
>>>>>>>>> for the ballot and any covering note that has to
>> be sent with the
>>>>>>>>> vote.____
>>>>>>>>> __ __
>>>>>>>>> Thank you.____
>>>>>>>>> Kind regards,____
>>>>>>>>> __ __
>>>>>>>>> Glen____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *__ __*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Machine tally:
>>>>>>>>> **Total Ballots Cast (including
>> duplicates):*13
>>>>>>>>> *Ballots Counted (excluding duplicates):* 13
>>>>>>>>> *Voters Who Haven't Voted:* 0 *____*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Ballot with added tally (using weights,
>> if any):*____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Select just one of the
>> nominees below____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1: 7 votes [] Avri Doria____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2: 6 votes [] Bill Graham____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 3: 0 votes [] None of the above____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *__ __*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Ballots Received:*____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> __ __
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ballot ID 1dd5b4c740cea13 Received at
>> 2014-04-11 16:49:17
>>>>>>>>> UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2: [X]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 3: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> __ __
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ballot ID 1a1b25296676fb1 Received at
>> 2014-04-11 15:28:42
>>>>>>>>> UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2: [X]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 3: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> __ __
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ballot ID 4c958b0a504c620 Received at
>> 2014-04-10 13:40:01
>>>>>>>>> UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2: [X]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 3: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> __ __
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ballot ID ad2820176335eb9 Received at
>> 2014-04-10 13:08:07
>>>>>>>>> UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1: [X]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 3: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> __ __
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ballot ID a1f76553370d1a0 Received at
>> 2014-04-10 09:26:14
>>>>>>>>> UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1: [X]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 3: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> __ __
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ballot ID fe7ceebe542d573 Received at
>> 2014-04-08 16:52:25
>>>>>>>>> UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2: [X]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 3: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> __ __
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ballot ID 38e81b64ae7b939 Received at
>> 2014-04-08 15:57:41
>>>>>>>>> UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2: [X]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 3: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> __ __
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ballot ID b38aaa35f39640a Received at
>> 2014-04-08 13:35:34
>>>>>>>>> UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2: [X]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 3: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> __ __
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ballot ID 7b27a78001e9a0e Received at
>> 2014-04-08 11:39:05
>>>>>>>>> UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1: [X]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 3: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> __ __
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ballot ID 4b5a67b6bf8b080 Received at
>> 2014-04-08 11:31:12
>>>>>>>>> UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1: [X]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 3: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> __ __
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ballot ID 56805a16c3eee62 Received at
>> 2014-04-08 09:48:11
>>>>>>>>> UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1: [X]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 3: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> __ __
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ballot ID a5658498dd4faf6 Received at
>> 2014-04-08 08:41:13
>>>>>>>>> UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1: [X]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 3: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> __ __
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ballot ID 149c308cf7d49b7 Received at
>> 2014-04-08 06:59:36
>>>>>>>>> UTC *(counted)*____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1: [X]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 3: [ ]____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> __ __
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> __ __
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Glen de Saint G?ry ____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> GNSO Secretariat ____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
>> <mailto:gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org>
>>>>>>>>> <mailto:gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
>> <mailto:gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org>>
>>>>>>>>> <mailto:gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
>> <mailto:gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org>> ____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://gnso.icann.org
>> <http://gnso.icann.org/>____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> __ __
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>>
>>>>>>>>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>>
>>>>>>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>>
>>>>>>>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>>
>>>>>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>>
>>>>>>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>>
>>>>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ***********************************************
>>>>>> William J. Drake
>>>>>> International Fellow & Lecturer
>>>>>> Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
>>>>>> University of Zurich, Switzerland
>>>>>> Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency,
>>>>>> ICANN, www.ncuc.org <http://www.ncuc.org>
>> <http://www.ncuc.org> <http://www.ncuc.org>
>>>>>> william.drake at uzh.ch
>> <mailto:william.drake at uzh.ch>
>> <mailto:william.drake at uzh.ch <mailto:william.drake at uzh.ch>>
>>>>>> <mailto:william.drake at uzh.ch
>> <mailto:william.drake at uzh.ch>> (direct),
>> wjdrake at gmail.com <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com>
>>>>>> <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com>>
>>>>>> <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com
>> <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com>> (lists),
>>>>>> www.williamdrake.org
>> <http://www.williamdrake.org> <http://www.williamdrake.org>
>>>>>> <http://www.williamdrake.org>
>>>>>> ***********************************************
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>>
>>>>>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>>
>>>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>>
>>>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>>
>>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>>
>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20140419/18b28ff1/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list