[PC-NCSG] Fwd: Request to re-schedule 10 April GNSO Council meeting to 17 April (re-send with minot correction)

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

Do we have, or need, a pre-call?

avri


On 07-Apr-14 10:24, Maria Farrell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Just FYI, there will be a GNSO Council call this week but it looks like
> we will not have one to ratify the results of the Board seat election -
> I'd originally asked Jonathan to put aside 17 April for that date.
> 
> Will keep everyone posted if another Council is called before the May
> meeting.
> 
> Cheers, m
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *Jonathan Robinson* <jrobinson at afilias.info
> <mailto:jrobinson at afilias.info>>
> Date: 1 April 2014 11:03
> Subject: RE: Request to re-schedule 10 April GNSO Council meeting to 17
> April (re-send with minot correction)
> To: Maria Farrell <maria.farrell at gmail.com
> <mailto:maria.farrell at gmail.com>>, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com
> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>, krosette at cov.com
> <mailto:krosette at cov.com>, Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com
> <mailto:marilynscade at hotmail.com>>, David Cake <dave at difference.com.au
> <mailto:dave at difference.com.au>>, "WUK1950 ."
> <Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de
> <mailto:Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de>>, "Metalitz, Steven"
> <met at msk.com <mailto:met at msk.com>>, "Tonyarholmes at btinternet.com
> <mailto:Tonyarholmes at btinternet.com>" <tonyarholmes at btinternet.com
> <mailto:tonyarholmes at btinternet.com>>, Rudi Vansnick
> <rudi.vansnick at isoc.be <mailto:rudi.vansnick at isoc.be>>, "gnso.icann"
> <gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
> <mailto:gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org>>, Marika Konings
> <marika.konings at icann.org <mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>>
> 
> 
> Dear Maria,____
> 
> __ __
> 
> Thank-you for this request.____
> 
> __ __
> 
> I have checked up on this and, whilst it is the case that the operating
> procedures make reference to ?confirmation of election? we will
> interpret this as essentially an administrative point and not something
> requiring a motion.____
> 
> Therefore, please do advise the Council of the NCPH selection as soon as
> practical and I will then take it upon myself (in my capacity as Council
> Chair) to notify ICANN.  ____
> 
> The GNSO Council will then take advantage of the next available Council
> meeting to confirm this for the record i.e. ?confirmation of election?
> by simply noting and recording the selection of the NCPH.____
> 
> __ __
> 
> Notwithstanding the above, the Council may well need to hold an
> additional meeting between now and the next scheduled meeting on May
> 8^th so please keep an eye out for any further discussion on the
> scheduling of An additional meeting.____
> 
> __ __
> 
> Best wishes,____
> 
> __ __
> 
> __ __
> 
> Jonathan____
> 
> __ __
> 
> *From:*Maria Farrell [mailto:maria.farrell at gmail.com
> <mailto:maria.farrell at gmail.com>]
> *Sent:* 28 March 2014 01:52
> *To:* Rafik Dammak; krosette at cov.com <mailto:krosette at cov.com>; Marilyn
> Cade; David Cake; WUK1950 .; Metalitz, Steven;
> Tonyarholmes at btinternet.com <mailto:Tonyarholmes at btinternet.com>; Rudi
> Vansnick; gnso.icann; Jonathan Robinson; Marika Konings
> *Subject:* Request to re-schedule 10 April GNSO Council meeting to 17
> April____
> 
> __ __
> 
> Dear Jonathan,____
> 
> Following up on our brief chat yesterday, the NCPH leadership met and
> decided a timeline for the election for Board Seat 14. ____
> 
> We would like to request that the GNSO Council meeting scheduled for 10
> April be re-scheduled to the 17 April. ____
> 
> (I relayed to everyone cc'ed that you need to check calendars and are
> double-checking the necessity of convening a meeting after the
> election.)____
> 
> 
> FYI we believe a short extension from ICANN's General Counsel to the
> current deadline of April 16 is possible. ____
> 
> Here are our agreed timings and procedure. ____
> 
> __ __
> 
> _Timing_:____
> 
>  ____
> 
> Round 1:  March 31-April 4____
> 
> Round 2:  April 8-11____
> 
> Round 3:  April 14-16____
> 
>  ____
> 
> _Votes required for candidate to win_:  8 of 13 (60%).  Ensures that
> elected Board member has received vote in support of her/his candidacy
> from at least one member of each SG in the NCPH.  ____
> 
> As I'm going to be offline for the next week, Rudi can follow up with
> you on this.____
> 
> __ __
> 
> Safe travels and alll the best, Maria____
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>