[PC-NCSG] Privacy and proxy accreditation working group

[Amr Elsadr]

Hello All,

On Nov 29, 2013, at 4:32 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I agree with Wendy here, chair role is critical and I don't see why someone here shouldn't volunteer

OK?, I?m sold. I was also happy to see Kathy?s name on the list of WG members. I could have sworn that Stephanie was there too, but I can?t seem to find her anymore. Roy, who had said that he signed up for it is also missing on the list. I?ll check with him to verify his participation.

> I see that you are working already on coordination and you can support each other there.  is Kathy also involved? I was thinking if it is possible to take such opportunity and bringing other privacy experts within NCSG to be involved in the WG (we have some and I will try to approach them).

Yes?, Stephanie would be great.

> also having newbies involved there to learn from you (there are really  few WGs where you can find several NCSG members involved), just following the discussion and endorsing your proposals and comments  can be enough(just think about the impact when it will be the  time to decide for the consensus..).

Definitely agree. I think newbies will have a great level of support from more experienced members here (I think I mentioned that before) weaning into the GNSO?s PDP on an issue of great importance to us.

> I don't want to add a burden on you, but we can work to expand the base of members participating in WGs , sharing the workload and doing some knowledge transfer because it can be definitely intimidating for newcomers.

Increasing the workload now would hopefully give us a broader base of members to lighten the load in the long run, and improve our representation in WGs. ?, that is if they sign up for more WGs in the future.

Thanks.

Amr