[PC-NCSG] [] NCSG Comment on ICANN's Whois Privacy & Proxy Abuse Study

[Amr Elsadr]

Thanks Avri. It? midnight here, so I?ll have to continue following this up tomorrow. As far as I can tell?, Kathy and I have edited the statement along the lines of Milton?s suggestions. Thank you so much for going over it, Milton.

I would like to know, should I send the comment in as an individual if the PC does not endorse it before the deadline? I would have to change all the references made to the NCSG in that case.

Again?, I really do apologise about drafting this so late before the deadline. I should have had it ready ages ago.

Thanks again to all.

Amr

On Nov 12, 2013, at 11:50 PM, Avri Doria <avri at ella.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> At this point we have 24 hours.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> About 24 hrs left.
> 
> Looking for endorsements from the members of this group for putting this forward as the NCSG position
> 
> I have seen a few endorsements, but none from the NPOC members in the group (unless I missed them).  
> 
> And there are Milton's comments.
> 
> I will continue to monitor.  
> 
> 
> avri
> 
> On 12 Nov 2013, at 18:49, Amr Elsadr wrote:
> 
>> Thanks for looking over it, Milton. I initially didn?t open editing rights to keep track of changes, but have changed that so that anyone can edit it now. I will insert some responses to your comments, and if you have the time to look over them and give more feedback, I?d really appreciate it.
>> 
>> Thanks again.
>> 
>> Amr
>> 
>> On Nov 12, 2013, at 10:32 PM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at SYR.EDU> wrote:
>> 
>>> Amr:
>>> 
>>> I have looked over the comments and would make some suggestions. I would edit it directly but I am not authorized on this doc so I have inserted some comments
>>> 
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: NCSG-Discuss [NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] on behalf of Amr Elsadr [aelsadr at EGYPTIG.ORG]
>>> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 8:01 AM
>>> To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
>>> Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] NCSG Comment on ICANN's Whois Privacy & Proxy Abuse Study
>>> 
>>> Thanks McTim,
>>> 
>>> I?ve replaced ?more study of Whois privacy and proxy abuse should be conducted? with ?more Whois privacy and proxy abuse research should be conducted? in the last paragraph. I hope that?s what you were referring to.
>>> 
>>> Thanks again.
>>> 
>>> Amr
>>> 
>>> On Nov 11, 2013, at 1:27 PM, McTim <dogwallah at GMAIL.COM> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I?ve taken a stab at drafting a comment on the ICANN Whois Privacy & Proxy
>>>>> Abuse Study. The public comment period is over, but we have until November
>>>>> 13th to submit a statement during the reply period. At this point, I would
>>>>> like to know if members of the NCSG as well as the policy committee are
>>>>> willing to endorse this statement, and whether or not there are any
>>>>> suggested changes anyone feels need to be made.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I?ve drafted the statement on a Google doc, which you can find here:
>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RS5Ze_0TU4ymdq0N8tROKrr2Vg-SpBp5ZEXTLUr7j84/edit?usp=sharing
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Instead of "Whois privacy and proxy service abuse should be conducted"
>>>> 
>>>> I think you need to add the word "research" so it becomes:
>>>> 
>>>> "Whois privacy and proxy service abuse research should be conducted"
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Then it is fine by me.
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> 
>>>> McTim
>>>> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
>>>> route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg