[PC-NCSG] [] NCSG Comment on ICANN's Whois Privacy & Proxy Abuse Study

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

At this point we have 24 hours.

Hi,

About 24 hrs left.

Looking for endorsements from the members of this group for putting this forward as the NCSG position

I have seen a few endorsements, but none from the NPOC members in the group (unless I missed them).  

And there are Milton's comments.

I will continue to monitor.  


avri

On 12 Nov 2013, at 18:49, Amr Elsadr wrote:

> Thanks for looking over it, Milton. I initially didn?t open editing rights to keep track of changes, but have changed that so that anyone can edit it now. I will insert some responses to your comments, and if you have the time to look over them and give more feedback, I?d really appreciate it.
> 
> Thanks again.
> 
> Amr
> 
> On Nov 12, 2013, at 10:32 PM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at SYR.EDU> wrote:
> 
>> Amr:
>> 
>> I have looked over the comments and would make some suggestions. I would edit it directly but I am not authorized on this doc so I have inserted some comments
>> 
>> ________________________________________
>> From: NCSG-Discuss [NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] on behalf of Amr Elsadr [aelsadr at EGYPTIG.ORG]
>> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 8:01 AM
>> To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
>> Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] NCSG Comment on ICANN's Whois Privacy & Proxy Abuse Study
>> 
>> Thanks McTim,
>> 
>> I?ve replaced ?more study of Whois privacy and proxy abuse should be conducted? with ?more Whois privacy and proxy abuse research should be conducted? in the last paragraph. I hope that?s what you were referring to.
>> 
>> Thanks again.
>> 
>> Amr
>> 
>> On Nov 11, 2013, at 1:27 PM, McTim <dogwallah at GMAIL.COM> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> I?ve taken a stab at drafting a comment on the ICANN Whois Privacy & Proxy
>>>> Abuse Study. The public comment period is over, but we have until November
>>>> 13th to submit a statement during the reply period. At this point, I would
>>>> like to know if members of the NCSG as well as the policy committee are
>>>> willing to endorse this statement, and whether or not there are any
>>>> suggested changes anyone feels need to be made.
>>>> 
>>>> I?ve drafted the statement on a Google doc, which you can find here:
>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RS5Ze_0TU4ymdq0N8tROKrr2Vg-SpBp5ZEXTLUr7j84/edit?usp=sharing
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Instead of "Whois privacy and proxy service abuse should be conducted"
>>> 
>>> I think you need to add the word "research" so it becomes:
>>> 
>>> "Whois privacy and proxy service abuse research should be conducted"
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Then it is fine by me.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>> McTim
>>> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
>>> route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20131112/f520f7fb/attachment.sig>