[PC-NCSG] let's proceed with challenging Board's dismissal of NCSG request for reconsideration of half-baked ™+50

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

I tend to agree with Robin.  As long as there is someone willing to do the work, we should follow through.

Yes, there are many thing that the NCSG should be working on, but the priority of which things are important and which aren't is really determined by the willingness of people to work on things.  It has become clear that ICANN does not listen to NCSG or much of anyone else from GNSO.  So sure we can continue to batter our collective heads against the wall on any particular issue.  This is an issue will clear visibility, so again, if someone is willing to the work, gods bless 'em and let them get on with it.

avri

On 13 Jul 2013, at 10:01, joy wrote:

> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hi - I really don't think we should do this. Sorry, but i just see this
> as a pointless exercise and not the best use of our limited time and
> resources.
> Joy
> 
> On 13/07/2013 4:25 a.m., Robin Gross wrote:
>> Let's proceed with challenging the Board's dismissal of NCSG's reconsideration request of its TM+50
> policy (in addition to a PDP to change it).  I believe we have a hard
> deadline by which we need to challenge the decision.... Ed, can you
> remind me of that and the next steps to challenge the decision with the CEP?
>> 
>> Thank you!
>> Robin
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
> 
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJR4QljAAoJEA9zUGgfM+bqDaYH/AuFs2xmjQsE+PxdbdRwrr4T
> q33uaVvopg2xkZlBqSxO+xpZxsrPsKn+jz/GhAPCdDE2efgTn/Pczqv/a+4QSsEy
> mx2qIyazmc/Y7QI2J3iGu6MkG2aXcOv97JuOm/xqtinQU9lftFm5IOlsMk1RYURE
> W5HmCuunqkzRZt8XpAPBpK4994iAart/Hv9bt//Fm7DSVgHAfMnMuHXgfdwyAxdE
> sLosNbFeXke1eCL9EXafcXWB+5vbRGWGDcclOZqOTgo6BWQ/RulHzIVelAJxpdGP
> T5gZRy1DWPYixfldVuAd3/O+0xPy1p4Mwd/o1nVGShdPFFea7avBzonsetIBYNE=
> =fi+O
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
>