[PC-NCSG] Proposed amendment to motion on Thick WHOIS

[Konstantinos Komaitis]

+1

KK

Sent from my iPhone - excuse any typos

On 13 Mar 2012, at 19:21, "Joy Liddicoat" <joy at apc.org> wrote:

> Thanks Wendy, that looks good
> Joy
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pc-ncsg-bounces at ipjustice.org [mailto:pc-ncsg-bounces at ipjustice.org]
> On Behalf Of Wendy Seltzer
> Sent: Wednesday, 14 March 2012 1:44 p.m.
> To: NCSG-Policy
> Subject: [PC-NCSG] Proposed amendment to motion on Thick WHOIS
> 
> Here's my proposed amendment, I'd start by asking Stephane whether it's
> friendly:
> 
> I propose to amend the motion to make it clear that the consideration of
> 'thick' WHOIS for all gTLDs can also consider 'thin' WHOIS for all gTLDs.
> 
>> Motion on the Initiation of a Policy Development Process (PDP) on 
>> ?thick? Whois
>> 
>> deferred from the Council meeting on 16 February 2012 Made by: 
>> St?phane van Gelder Seconded by: Yoav Keren Amended by David Taylor 
>> (in bold
>> 
>> Whereas the GNSO Council requested an Issue Report on ?thick? Whois at 
>> its meeting on 22 September 2011 (see 
>> http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/#201109);
>> 
>> Whereas a Preliminary Issue Report on ?thick? Whois was posted on 21 
>> November 2011 for public comment (see 
>> http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-2-21nov11-en.htm);
>> 
>> Whereas a Final Issue Report on ?thick? Whois was published on 2 
>> February 2012 (see 
>> http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois/final-report-thick-whois-02feb12-en
>> .pdf);
>> 
>> Whereas, the Final Issue Report recommends that the GNSO Council proceed
> with a Policy Development Process limited to consideration of the issues
> discussed in this report, and the General Counsel of ICANN has indicated the
> topic is properly within the scope of the ICANN policy process and within
> the scope of the GNSO.
> 
> ADD: Whereas the Final Issue Report recommends "that further investigation
> of ?thick? Whois for all gTLDs would be beneficial to the community
> generally, as it would allow for an informed decision by the GNSO Council as
> to whether ?thick? Whois for all gTLDs should be required or not."
> 
>> 
>> [Whereas nothing in this motion is intended to prejudice migration to 
>> thick Whois through contractual means]
>> 
>> THEREFORE BE IT:
>> Resolved, the GNSO will initiate a PDP on the issues defined in the 
>> Final Issue Report on ?thick? Whois
> 
> ADD: specifically directing consideration of 'thin' WHOIS for all gTLDs as
> well as 'thick';
> 
>> (see 
>> http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois/final-report-thick-whois-02feb12-en
>> .pdf)
>> 
>> Resolved, a DT will be formed to create a charter for a Working Group,
> which will be submitted to the GNSO Council for its approval.
>> 
>> Resolved, following the approval of the charter, a Working Group will be
> created for the purpose of fulfilling the requirements of the PDP.
> 
> .........................................................
> 
> --
> Wendy Seltzer -- wendy at seltzer.org +1 914-374-0613 Fellow, Yale Law School
> Information Society Project Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at
> Harvard University http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
> https://www.chillingeffects.org/
> https://www.torproject.org/
> http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg