[PC-NCSG] Proposed amendment to motion on Thick WHOIS

[Joy Liddicoat]

Thanks Wendy, that looks good
Joy

-----Original Message-----
From: pc-ncsg-bounces at ipjustice.org [mailto:pc-ncsg-bounces at ipjustice.org]
On Behalf Of Wendy Seltzer
Sent: Wednesday, 14 March 2012 1:44 p.m.
To: NCSG-Policy
Subject: [PC-NCSG] Proposed amendment to motion on Thick WHOIS

Here's my proposed amendment, I'd start by asking Stephane whether it's
friendly:

I propose to amend the motion to make it clear that the consideration of
'thick' WHOIS for all gTLDs can also consider 'thin' WHOIS for all gTLDs.

> Motion on the Initiation of a Policy Development Process (PDP) on 
> ?thick? Whois
> 
> deferred from the Council meeting on 16 February 2012 Made by: 
> St?phane van Gelder Seconded by: Yoav Keren Amended by David Taylor 
> (in bold
> 
> Whereas the GNSO Council requested an Issue Report on ?thick? Whois at 
> its meeting on 22 September 2011 (see 
> http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/#201109);
> 
> Whereas a Preliminary Issue Report on ?thick? Whois was posted on 21 
> November 2011 for public comment (see 
> http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-2-21nov11-en.htm);
> 
> Whereas a Final Issue Report on ?thick? Whois was published on 2 
> February 2012 (see 
> http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois/final-report-thick-whois-02feb12-en
> .pdf);
> 
> Whereas, the Final Issue Report recommends that the GNSO Council proceed
with a Policy Development Process limited to consideration of the issues
discussed in this report, and the General Counsel of ICANN has indicated the
topic is properly within the scope of the ICANN policy process and within
the scope of the GNSO.

ADD: Whereas the Final Issue Report recommends "that further investigation
of ?thick? Whois for all gTLDs would be beneficial to the community
generally, as it would allow for an informed decision by the GNSO Council as
to whether ?thick? Whois for all gTLDs should be required or not."

> 
> [Whereas nothing in this motion is intended to prejudice migration to 
> thick Whois through contractual means]
> 
>  THEREFORE BE IT:
> Resolved, the GNSO will initiate a PDP on the issues defined in the 
> Final Issue Report on ?thick? Whois

ADD: specifically directing consideration of 'thin' WHOIS for all gTLDs as
well as 'thick';

> (see 
> http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois/final-report-thick-whois-02feb12-en
> .pdf)
> 
> Resolved, a DT will be formed to create a charter for a Working Group,
which will be submitted to the GNSO Council for its approval.
> 
> Resolved, following the approval of the charter, a Working Group will be
created for the purpose of fulfilling the requirements of the PDP.

.........................................................

--
Wendy Seltzer -- wendy at seltzer.org +1 914-374-0613 Fellow, Yale Law School
Information Society Project Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at
Harvard University http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
https://www.chillingeffects.org/
https://www.torproject.org/
http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/



_______________________________________________
PC-NCSG mailing list
PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg