[NCSG-EC] NCSG sessions draft agendas

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Pedro,

Thanks for the material, let me check and see if we can share them with GAC.
If we meet with CSG, it means de facto a NCPH meeting :)

Best,

Rafik

On Thu, Feb 20, 2025, 00:48 Pedro de Perdigão Lana <
pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Rafik,
>
> As a follow-up, I'm not sure if we will be able to have someone on our
> side who was involved with the SubPro/New gTLDs from the beginning and is
> deeply knowledgeable on the subject on this day, so it may not be very
> fruitful to have this discussion.
>
> (Btw, I may have confused myself a bit - are we having a separate session
> only with the CSG, or are we talking about the NCPH session here?)
>
> Cordially,
>
> *Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
> Lawyer <https://www.nic.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>
> Researcher
> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC <https://www.ncuc.org> & NCSG
> <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN), IODA
> <https://ioda.org.br/> and CC Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>
> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by
> mistake, please reply informing it.
>
>
> Em ter., 18 de fev. de 2025 às 22:34, Pedro de Perdigão Lana <
> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> escreveu:
>
>> Hi Rafik, all,
>>
>> We do have slides prepared by multiple members of NCSG, but more of an
>> explanation of the ASP handbook. They do, however, have some important
>> commentaries about gaps and risks among them. We also have the Public
>> Comment that Bolu led re: Review of the Draft Applicant Support Program
>> Handbook
>>
>> Besides those who are focused on the ASP, we have public comments we
>> elaborated collectively to the Second Proceeding and Third Proceeding of
>> the Next Round of AGB, which are useful for a potential discussion with the
>> CSG about the Next Round (if others feel that there are topics that would
>> benefit from a conversation with the CSG in this area)
>>
>> I am sending those four documents attached. I hope they are helpful.
>>
>> Cordially,
>>
>> *Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
>> Lawyer <https://www.nic.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>
>> Researcher
>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC <https://www.ncuc.org> & NCSG
>> <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN), IODA
>> <https://ioda.org.br/> and CC Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>
>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by
>> mistake, please reply informing it.
>>
>>
>> Em ter., 18 de fev. de 2025 às 03:02, Rafik Dammak <
>> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> escreveu:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> a reminder if you have any comments on the draft agenda.
>>> On the other hand, we got a request from GAC if we have any material
>>> about HRIA on DNS and gTLD Applicant Support we want to share with them and
>>> to be added to the briefing for GAC members. @farzaneh badii
>>> <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>  @Pedro de Perdigão Lana
>>> <pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com>  do you have anything we can share or
>>> if we can prepare something quickly based on previous work
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Rafik
>>>
>>> Le jeu. 13 févr. 2025 à 17:09, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> a
>>> écrit :
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> some updates to share
>>>> for CSG session, they shared those topics for our consideration:
>>>>
>>>>    - Providing NCPH input to ICANN CEO regarding ICANN priorities
>>>>    - Further Day 0 event planning (perhaps for Muscat) for NCPH
>>>>    - Regular quarterly house meetings
>>>>    - WSIS + 20
>>>>
>>>> In addition we proposed  those: membership system follow-up, board seat
>>>> 14, DNS abuse positions and plan. We will need to get board seat 14
>>>> procedure finalized by Prague as the process will start by then.
>>>> I think those are acceptable topics and linked to what we discussed
>>>> previously with them
>>>> Regarding DNS abuse they acknowledge that we have different views and
>>>> ask how we can have productive discussion on the topic and move ahead.
>>>> let me know if you agree with this list
>>>>
>>>> for GAC, as we discussed during the NCSG policy call, we can send to
>>>> the GAC those 2 topics and finalize the agenda:    HRIA on DNS and gTLD
>>>> Applicant Support
>>>>
>>>> any comment or question for the rest?
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Rafik
>>>> Le ven. 7 févr. 2025 à 17:29, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> a
>>>> écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am coordinating the agenda for the joint sessions with CPH, CSG,
>>>>> ALAC and GAC, the current status is:
>>>>> - Waiting for comments from CSG about the draft topics  we shared:
>>>>> membership system follow-up, board seat 14, DNS abuse positions and plan.
>>>>> They didn't propose anything yet from their side.
>>>>> - I shared again those topics (HRIA on DNS abuse, applicant support, ethics
>>>>> policy and community participant code, continuous improvement program) with ALAC
>>>>> waiting for their comments and Jonathan asked about the INFERMAL report (
>>>>> https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-webinar-to-discuss-infermal-a-project-focused-on-malicious-domain-registrations-05-02-2025-en
>>>>> ). We might review and pick up some topics from the list.
>>>>> - For CPH, they are discussing internally and we shared this initial
>>>>> topic of HRIA on DNS Abuse. They didn't propose any topic from their
>>>>> side yet.
>>>>> - GAC proposed this based on back and forth discussion:
>>>>> 1- Introduction of the NCSG and its work (5 mins)
>>>>> 2- Discussion on (25 mins) :
>>>>>     HRIA on DNS
>>>>>     gTLD Applicant Support
>>>>>     Public Interest Commitments (PICs)
>>>>>
>>>>> I have concerns about whether we can really cover ASP and PICs and how
>>>>> much we can discuss about the latter. Please let me know your thoughts and
>>>>> which we should pick up.
>>>>>
>>>>> - For SSAC, we cannot meet them this time but I agreed with SSAC chair
>>>>> Ram Mohan to schedule it for Prague meeting. Andea will handle that on due
>>>>> time.
>>>>>
>>>>> In the meantime, I want to confirm for those topics who can be the
>>>>> lead for each. For HRIA on DNS abuse, I am assuming Farzaneh and Michaela
>>>>> can handle that, for ASP that can be Pedro and Manju for continuous
>>>>> improvement.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regarding other NCSG sessions such as NCSG membership, I invited the
>>>>> new policy head in ICANN but he cannot confirm yet and if we cannot meet
>>>>> him in Seattle we will schedule a call with him later.
>>>>> For the NCSG policy related meetings, @Tomslin Samme-Nlar
>>>>> <mesumbeslin at gmail.com>  can share from his side. For the NCSG issue
>>>>> forum, @Pedro de Perdigão Lana <pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com>  can
>>>>> you share more about the selected topic and agenda?
>>>>>
>>>>> So please give me your input about the points above.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>>
>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>
>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-ec/attachments/20250220/3d2f7d2f/attachment.htm>