[NCSG-EC] NCSG sessions draft agendas

Wed Feb 19 17:47:52 EET 2025

Hi Rafik,

As a follow-up, I'm not sure if we will be able to have someone on our side
who was involved with the SubPro/New gTLDs from the beginning and is deeply
knowledgeable on the subject on this day, so it may not be very fruitful to
have this discussion.

(Btw, I may have confused myself a bit - are we having a separate session
only with the CSG, or are we talking about the NCPH session here?)

Cordially,

*Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
Lawyer <https://www.nic.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>
Researcher
PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC <https://www.ncuc.org> & NCSG
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN), IODA
<https://ioda.org.br/> and CC Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>
This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by
mistake, please reply informing it.

Em ter., 18 de fev. de 2025 às 22:34, Pedro de Perdigão Lana <
pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> escreveu:

> Hi Rafik, all,
>
> We do have slides prepared by multiple members of NCSG, but more of an
> explanation of the ASP handbook. They do, however, have some important
> commentaries about gaps and risks among them. We also have the Public
> Comment that Bolu led re: Review of the Draft Applicant Support Program
> Handbook
>
> Besides those who are focused on the ASP, we have public comments we
> elaborated collectively to the Second Proceeding and Third Proceeding of
> the Next Round of AGB, which are useful for a potential discussion with the
> CSG about the Next Round (if others feel that there are topics that would
> benefit from a conversation with the CSG in this area)
>
> I am sending those four documents attached. I hope they are helpful.
>
> Cordially,
>
> *Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
> Lawyer <https://www.nic.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>
> Researcher
> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC <https://www.ncuc.org> & NCSG
> <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN), IODA
> <https://ioda.org.br/> and CC Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>
> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by
> mistake, please reply informing it.
>
>
> Em ter., 18 de fev. de 2025 às 03:02, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
> escreveu:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> a reminder if you have any comments on the draft agenda.
>> On the other hand, we got a request from GAC if we have any material
>> about HRIA on DNS and gTLD Applicant Support we want to share with them and
>> to be added to the briefing for GAC members. @farzaneh badii
>> <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>  @Pedro de Perdigão Lana
>> <pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com>  do you have anything we can share or if
>> we can prepare something quickly based on previous work
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> Le jeu. 13 févr. 2025 à 17:09, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> some updates to share
>>> for CSG session, they shared those topics for our consideration:
>>>
>>>    - Providing NCPH input to ICANN CEO regarding ICANN priorities
>>>    - Further Day 0 event planning (perhaps for Muscat) for NCPH
>>>    - Regular quarterly house meetings
>>>    - WSIS + 20
>>>
>>> In addition we proposed  those: membership system follow-up, board seat
>>> 14, DNS abuse positions and plan. We will need to get board seat 14
>>> procedure finalized by Prague as the process will start by then.
>>> I think those are acceptable topics and linked to what we discussed
>>> previously with them
>>> Regarding DNS abuse they acknowledge that we have different views and
>>> ask how we can have productive discussion on the topic and move ahead.
>>> let me know if you agree with this list
>>>
>>> for GAC, as we discussed during the NCSG policy call, we can send to the
>>> GAC those 2 topics and finalize the agenda:    HRIA on DNS and gTLD
>>> Applicant Support
>>>
>>> any comment or question for the rest?
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Rafik
>>> Le ven. 7 févr. 2025 à 17:29, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> a
>>> écrit :
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I am coordinating the agenda for the joint sessions with CPH, CSG, ALAC
>>>> and GAC, the current status is:
>>>> - Waiting for comments from CSG about the draft topics  we shared:
>>>> membership system follow-up, board seat 14, DNS abuse positions and plan.
>>>> They didn't propose anything yet from their side.
>>>> - I shared again those topics (HRIA on DNS abuse, applicant support, ethics
>>>> policy and community participant code, continuous improvement program) with ALAC
>>>> waiting for their comments and Jonathan asked about the INFERMAL report (
>>>> https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-webinar-to-discuss-infermal-a-project-focused-on-malicious-domain-registrations-05-02-2025-en
>>>> ). We might review and pick up some topics from the list.
>>>> - For CPH, they are discussing internally and we shared this initial
>>>> topic of HRIA on DNS Abuse. They didn't propose any topic from their
>>>> side yet.
>>>> - GAC proposed this based on back and forth discussion:
>>>> 1- Introduction of the NCSG and its work (5 mins)
>>>> 2- Discussion on (25 mins) :
>>>>     HRIA on DNS
>>>>     gTLD Applicant Support
>>>>     Public Interest Commitments (PICs)
>>>>
>>>> I have concerns about whether we can really cover ASP and PICs and how
>>>> much we can discuss about the latter. Please let me know your thoughts and
>>>> which we should pick up.
>>>>
>>>> - For SSAC, we cannot meet them this time but I agreed with SSAC chair
>>>> Ram Mohan to schedule it for Prague meeting. Andea will handle that on due
>>>> time.
>>>>
>>>> In the meantime, I want to confirm for those topics who can be the lead
>>>> for each. For HRIA on DNS abuse, I am assuming Farzaneh and Michaela can
>>>> handle that, for ASP that can be Pedro and Manju for continuous improvement.
>>>>
>>>> Regarding other NCSG sessions such as NCSG membership, I invited the
>>>> new policy head in ICANN but he cannot confirm yet and if we cannot meet
>>>> him in Seattle we will schedule a call with him later.
>>>> For the NCSG policy related meetings, @Tomslin Samme-Nlar
>>>> <mesumbeslin at gmail.com>  can share from his side. For the NCSG issue
>>>> forum, @Pedro de Perdigão Lana <pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com>  can
>>>> you share more about the selected topic and agenda?
>>>>
>>>> So please give me your input about the points above.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Rafik
>>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-ec/attachments/20250219/d52e3d5b/attachment-0001.htm>