[NCSG-EC] Fwd: NomCom changes

[Johan Helsingius]

Of those, the only one we haven't done is the letter to the
board, but we have met multiple times with people from the
board governance committee (that according to the board is
the appropriate people to talk to). They understand the issue,
but it is the usual "it is up to the community".

The CPH is ready to support us in a vote, but won't do anything
active. That is at least an improvement compared to the
earlier situation when they didn't support us in the council
vote on this matter.

ISPCP don't want to go against CPH "consensus".

What everyone is saying is "you had your chance with the
review team" - unfortunately our reps let us down, and we
didn't check on them. We had a second chance when the
council voted to approve the team recommendations, but
that was an uphill struggle and we failed to do enough
to convince people in the period leading up to the vote.

Now the response I get is often "you will have to wait
for the holistic review that will probably rehash the
whole GNSO structure", but that will take forever.

	Julf

On 03/06/2024 02:34, farzaneh badii wrote:
> I wonder if we should do it in a more effective way:
> 1) write a letter to the board
> 2) set up meetings with the cph to specifically talk about this
> 3) talk to ISPCP
> 
> And highlight the issue and make it public. It’s just that somebody 
> needs to volunteer to do those things and I don’t have the bandwidth to 
> follow up. Can somebody volunteer?
> 
> Farzaneh
> 
> 
> On Sun, Jun 2, 2024 at 8:07 AM Johan Helsingius <julf at julf.com 
> <mailto:julf at julf.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On 02/06/2024 13:31, Caleb Olumuyiwa Ogundele wrote:
>      > I think we should still press for the equal distribution.  Two
>     seats for
>      > the BC???
> 
>     We have been (and keep on) pressing. Yes, the two BC seats don't make
>     any sense. It was classic Marilyn Cade.
> 
>              Julf
>