[NCSG-EC] [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [CORRESPONDENCE] Tripti Sinha to Johan (Julf) Helsingius RE: NomCom Rebalancing

Thu Apr 27 19:58:07 EEST 2023

@ Stephanie, I'd be interested to work with you on this. We can also
schedule an hour meeting to discuss since we are in the same time zone. I
also know a couple of people interested in joining the write-up and the
approach we can adopt.

But first, let me do some basic breakdown using the GNSO and ALAC as
comparison vs the fact that the new bylaw continues to empower delegates as
voting members means that if ALAC has 5 votes as a single
constituency based on their RALOs, then, we are short playing ourselves if
we don't get 3 slots for NCUC, NPOC, and NCSG. However, that is not
realistic and will never be considered. what I think is realistic is to get
the 2 slots distributed between NCUC and NPOC but decided by NCSG which is
the mothership. The additional implication is that numbers-wise, we can be
out-voted if our interest does not align.

I also understand that when we send representatives there, they look at the
overall perspective of ICANN as an ORG. However, there are human elements
and biases when it comes to constituency reflection on the board and other
roles.

[image: image.png]

Visually from the image above, it shows that BC  and RSG has two slots.
What we can consider is approach through backchanneling for balancing from
this perspective.

On the other hand, as per the new bylaw change request, there is a blank
cheque here by the strike-through in the document. What I rather perceive
is that there is a big reset here that allows all seven GNSO folks to come
together and reconfigure. What the strike-through means is that we give you
guys 7 slots, go fix it amongst yourselves.
Quoting Julf from a different exchange which I totally agree with ."GNSO to
give NCSG 2
slots and the CSG to have 3 slots and CPH to have 2 slots"

[image: image.png]

The strikethrough in the image below technically means the NCUC does not
have the unique powers to only send someone to NomCom as decided by their
EC alone.
It empowers NCSG more this time. This then means NCSG will try to balance
both NCUC/ NPOC internally.
[image: image.png]

On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 7:30 AM Johan Helsingius via NCSG-EC <
ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote:

> Indeed. We need to be purely fact-based, as we are facing a lot of "the
> non-commercials just feel they are not important enough". We definitely
> need to hear both from our nomcom reps as well as those involved in the
> review specifically.
>
> It would be great if you could take the lead. Should we open the
> discussion to our whole membership?
>
>         Julf
>
> On 27/04/2023 06:35, Digital wrote:
> > I would say that this calls for a very thorough, fact-packed response,
> not just a shrill shriek about fairness.   It needs a qualitative review of
> past selections….who exactly have the ALAC reps been picking over the past
> 20 Years ?  (I know I know, we cant get that data) .  How are end users
> actually protected in this community, snd what role should nomcom nominees
> play in that regard?
> > May I just add that “at a point in time” is one of the most meaningless
> cliches in the english language.  this exercise may well be equally
> meaningless but we have to give it our best effort.  Happy to volunteer to
> draft, but we need to contact everyone who worked on the nomcom review for
> their input, I can think of Wolfgang and Brenden but doubtless there were
> others.
> > cheers Steph
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> >> On Apr 27, 2023, at 00:37, Johan Helsingius <julf at julf.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Wow!
> >>
> >>     Julf
> >>
> >>
> >> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> >> Subject:    [CORRESPONDENCE] Tripti Sinha to Johan (Julf) Helsingius
> RE: NomCom Rebalancing
> >> Date:    Wed, 26 Apr 2023 19:34:24 +0000
> >> From:    Wendy Profit <wendy.profit at icann.org>
> >> To:    julf at julf.com <julf at julf.com>
> >> CC:    tripti.sinha at board.icann.org <tripti.sinha at board.icann.org>,
> Correspondence <Correspondence at icann.org>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Dear Johan (Julf) Helsingius,
> >>
> >> Please find the attached letter from Tripti Sinha, Chair, ICANN Board
> of Directors regarding NomCom Rebalancing.
> >>
> >> Thank you and best regards,
> >>
> >> Wendy Profit
> >>
> >> Board Operations Senior Manager
> >>
> >> ICANN
> >> <2023-04-26 Tripti Sinha to Julf Helsingius re NomCom Rebalancing.pdf>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> NCSG-PC mailing list
> >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-EC mailing list
> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec
>

-- 
*Caleb Ogundele*
Email: muyiwacaleb at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-ec/attachments/20230427/12e8328f/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 297704 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-ec/attachments/20230427/12e8328f/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 84441 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-ec/attachments/20230427/12e8328f/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 128367 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-ec/attachments/20230427/12e8328f/attachment-0002.png>