[NCSG-EC] Adoption of two Operating Procedures on Re-allocation of ICANN Travel Slots and Members Removal

[farzaneh badii]

I drafted the travel policy it's the first of its kind. Robin had drafted
the removal policy during Tapani time it was shared with the list never
followed up on for adoption by then EC.

I have explained that when I sent an email to ncsg mailing list for members
to comment.

On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 7:30 AM Raoul Plommer <plommer at gmail.com> wrote:

> I made some comments. Are these procedures the first of their kind, or are
> there original versions (that are in effect) of these updated drafts?
>
> -Raoul
>
> On 11 July 2018 at 07:03, farzaneh badii via NCSG-EC <
> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote:
>
>> I need comments on this and if you agree with the docs and don't think
>> the additions I made are substantive then we can adopt it. I just added
>> some information regarding the allocation of slots by ICANN. It's
>> informational.
>>
>>
>> There are a couple of questions by Elsa in NCSG removal of members
>> procedure which needs to be answered by us and if there are substantive
>> changes then I suggest putting the document up for comments for a shorter
>> period of time on NCSG mailing list and then adopt. We can seek comment on
>> the parts that we believe substantive changes have been made and not the
>> full document.
>>
>> Would be grateful for answers by Friday.
>>
>> Best
>> Farzaneh
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 10:00 AM farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear EC,
>>>
>>> Yesterday was the deadline for members to comment on the following
>>> procedures:
>>>
>>> Removal of members:
>>>
>>> Re-allocation of travel:
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sSJWajPGAIz9_mwNFiS7YlUg5CYtKdN5HejtaVojXo0/edit#
>>>
>>> Members Removal:
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fg6eTBDlzbC1qS8guEJPv0mYfoivOBNlT7L6QO-fv4c/edit?ts=5b3aca57#heading=h.gjdgxs
>>>
>>>
>>> I tried to resolve the issues as much as I could as you see on the
>>> mailing list and in the document. A couple of points by Elsa raised on
>>> Members removal which I think Robin could address them.
>>>
>>> If we make substantive changes to this document from this point on that
>>> changes the nature of the documents then I suggest send it back to the
>>> members for a short period of commenting and then approve it. At this point
>>> I don't see such substantive changes needed.
>>>
>>> Best
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Farzaneh
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-EC mailing list
>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec
>>
>>
> --
Farzaneh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-ec/attachments/20180711/e17b85c6/attachment.htm>