[NCSG-EC] Constituency review - questionnaire draft

[Tapani Tarvainen]

Dear all,

I'm going to take silence as indication of approval and send this to
constituency chairs tomorrow without further changes, unless someone
objects before that.

Regards,

Tapani

On Mar 03 13:27, Tapani Tarvainen via NCSG-EC (ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is) wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
> As discussed in our last meeting, I've updated the planned
> constituency review questionnaire. I hope to be able to send
> it out before Copenhagen meeting, preferably early next week.
> 
> Comments welcome.
> 
> ---------------------------------8<---------------------------------
> 
> Dear Chair,
> 
> NCSG Executive Committee is conducting Constituency Review, as required
> by NCSG Charter 2.3.3, to determine if any recommendation should be made
> to the Board regarding a change in status of any Constituency.
> 
> To that end we ask you to answer to the questions below.
> 
> 1a) What is the purpose of your constituency, as defined
>     in your bylaws?
>     (Preferably both link to your bylaws in the web as
>     well as copy of the relevant text.)
> 
> 1b) Are all your members also members of NCSG (yes/no)?
>     (This is just formal confirmation that you fulfill
>     the requirement in NCSG Charter.)
> 
> 1c) What is the the common interest or background of
>     your membership and the focus of your group?
> 
> 2) Do you have a publicly dynamic, publicly (world-readably) archived
>    mailing lists and where their archives can be found (URL)?
>    Please provide a brief description of the list(s), in particular
>    if they are used for actual decision-making or only discussion.
> 
>    If you have other, non-public fora that are used for
>    decision-making or significant discussions within your
>    constituency, please describe them as well.
> 
> 3) Do you participate actively in relevant NCSG and GNSO
>    PDP Working Groups or Work Teams?
> 
>    Please provide as complete as possible list of such groups or teams
>    and names of your people who've participated in them over the
>    years 2015 and 2016, noting also any who've been Chairs or Co-Chairs.
> 
> 4) Have you participated actively in submitting comments and
>    other policy statements to the NCSG and GNSO?
> 
>    Please provide as complete list as possible of such comments
>    and statements you've made during 2015-2016, with links to
>    where they've been published.
> 
>    Please also describe the process how your constituency makes
>    and agrees on public comments, in particular including if and
>    how non-members can contribute.
> 
> 5) Do you have a list of your current membership publicly
>    visible in the web? If so, where (URL)?
> 
>    Do you have at least 10 participants who've signed up to
>    an updated SOI?
> 
>    If your public member list does not have links to SOIs,
>    please provide a list (links to SOIs) of at least 10
>    of your members.
> 
> For all questions: If you have plans or projects in progress
> that may affect your situation in the future, including but
> not limited to changes in your bylaws, please describe them.
> 
> Please reply to me by 15 May, 2017, even if you can't come up with
> complete answers to all questions by that time. We will to ask for
> more details and clarifications as needed and engage you in discussion
> about possible problems, and welcome any questions or concerns you may
> have about this before answering.
> 
> The intent is to complete the review by ICANN59 meeting in Johannesburg,
> but we may take longer if needed.
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> Tapani Tarvainen
> NCSG Chair
> 
> ---------------------------------8<---------------------------------