[NCSG-EC] Fwd: Urgent - ICANN Academy: Leadership Program & Pilot Chairing Skills Program

[Tapani Tarvainen]

Hi Monica,

In this case the reaction window was short for me as well, I only got
request for endorsement from Gisella on Wednesday when I was offline
most of the day.

Of course ultimately the fault is still mine, I should have made it clear
to people that when registering for the program they should've notified
me separately so I would've known about them early on and been able to
bring the names to the EC earlier as well.

In general I will definitely try to make sure there's at least a week
of response time for all email questions.

Best,

Tapani

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 10:30:02PM +0000, Zalnieriute, Monika (Monika.Zalnieriute at EUI.eu) wrote:

> Dear Tapani,
> 
> 
> Thanks for sharing this.
> 
> 
> Albeit I am slightly confused as to what was the window for comment on this (my inbox shows that You sent it just yesterday)? I see that the staff e-mails were asking to reply by the end of the week, and if You sent that question to the EC only Friday or even Thursday this week, there should be no expectation for people to reply in a day, half a day or similar time window, cause we all have jobs and things to do.
> 
> 
> So I think we need some common understanding of what are the expected reply time windows, and have a bit more clarity by when the answers are needed.
> 
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
> 
> Monika
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> 
> 
> Dr. Monika Zalnieriute
> 
> 
> 
> Post-Doctoral Fellow @ Melbourne Law School |
> 
> The University of Melbourne I law.unimelb.edu.au I
> 
> 185 Pelham St, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia I
> 
> 
> 
> Visiting Fellow @ Center for Media, Data and Society I
> 
> Central European University I cmds.ceu.edu I
> 
> 
> 
> Representative @ Executive Committee I
> 
> Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group I ICANN I icann.org I
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: NCSG-EC <ncsg-ec-bounces at lists.ncsg.is> on behalf of Tapani Tarvainen via NCSG-EC <ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is>
> Sent: Friday, January 13, 2017 2:39 PM
> To: ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is
> Subject: Re: [NCSG-EC] Fwd: Urgent - ICANN Academy: Leadership Program & Pilot Chairing Skills Program
> 
> Nobody commented but seems there's not much need either.
> 
> Raoul confirmed he's available and has travel funding.
> 
> Farell did not reply at all to my (repeated) mail.
> 
> After my double check request Gisella found two more who'd registered
> for the LP program, namely Farzaneh Badii and Ayden Ferdeline (who'd
> indicated both NCUC and NCSG in his application), but neither is
> available any more (Farzi had already withdrawn her registration,
> Ayden replied to my email quickly).
> 
> So that leaves little choice: Raoul it is.
> 
> I'll put Farell in as the alternate just in case.
> 
> Tapani
> 
> On Jan 12 16:21, Tapani Tarvainen via NCSG-EC (ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is) wrote:
> 
> > Dear all,
> >
> > It seems only two of our members applied for the ICANN Academy
> > Leadership program:
> >
> > ----- Forwarded message from Gisella Gruber <Gisella.Gruber at icann.org> -----
> >
> > Dear Tapani,
> >
> > please confirm the final selection of your candidate for the Leadership Program.
> >
> >   *   Registered for the Leadership Program: Farell Folly and Raoul Plommer
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Please confirm your final candidate as we have to finalise the names THIS WEEK.
> >
> > ----- End forwarded message -----
> >
> > As far as I know neither is a supported traveler to Copenhagen nor
> > currently in any leadership position. The program is directed to
> > future leaders as well as current ones so the latter is not critical,
> > but as travel support is not included they'd have to fund their way to
> > the meeting otherwise.
> >
> > I have written both and asked them to (1) confirm if they have travel
> > funding and (2) tell what leadership positions they hold or aspire to.
> >
> > (I was a bit surprised to see only two applicants, and I did ask
> > Gisella to double check none have been missed.)
> >
> > One should be named as the primary candidate and one as alternate
> > in case there're slots to spare or the primary can't make it.
> >
> > Confirmed ability to attend (including travel funding) would be rather
> > obvious selection criteria, but if both have that, the decision won't
> > be obvious - opinions welcome. (I will let you know when I get their
> > responses to my questions.)
> >
> >
> > For the other program, Chairing Skills, requirement was being current
> > Chair of some group or committee and I was the only such, so it falls
> > on me. I definitely could be better at Chairing so perhaps it'll be
> > useful. :-)
> >
> > --
> > Tapani Tarvainen
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-EC mailing list
> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec
> 
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, forwarding, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited without the express permission of the sender. If you received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

-- 
Tapani Tarvainen