[NCSG-EC] [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [Ncph-intersessional2017] Board Seat Selection Process
matthew shears
mshears at cdt.org
Tue Feb 21 12:13:55 EET 2017
Thanks Rafik
Not sure much was agreed except that we need to deal with it and we are
running out of time.
First we had the timeline from Greg before the meeting, which was not
really discussed further. Then we had some general discussion about the
need to do something on the Board selection process. People voiced their
views on different aspects of the process and there was concern over the
timeline, but we did not really decide anything (others please jump in
as I may have missed some important aspects). Markus announced he
wanted to continue in the role; I announced I was going to run. Then
the CSG proposal for a process was circulated on Thurs AM. There seemed
to be general agreement that the CSG proposal was not ideal.
I think the key immediate thing is us agreeing a process and timeline
for nominations and getting that announced, so at least the initial
stages of the process are underway.
Matthew
On 20/02/2017 10:56, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> We got this note from Greg to resume the discussion on board seat
> election.
> First thing, is it possible to get a summary of what or not agreed on
> iceland on that regard from those who attended intersessional?
>
> We also need to outline what are our non-negotiable points such as
> having vote, NCA participation and so on.
>
> I think tgat the CSG proposal from last week is far from our expectations.
> There is also proposal to have a call. We can have it by end of this
> week but we do need to be ready.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Greg Shatan" <gregshatanipc at gmail.com
> <mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>>
> Date: Feb 20, 2017 2:13 PM
> Subject: [Ncph-intersessional2017] Board Seat Selection Process
> To: <ncph-intersessional2017 at icann.org
> <mailto:ncph-intersessional2017 at icann.org>>
> Cc:
>
> All,
>
> We probably need a different mailing list to finish working on the
> Board Seat selection process, and a small group to do it, but I'll
> start here, since I think this is the only active mailing list
> with both sides of the NCPH on it.
>
> We basically have no time to work this out, and we've already
> started the process without knowing what it is exactly, since we
> have now received nominations.
>
> In addition to the adaptation of the CPH procedures previously
> circulated, I'm also attaching the following for consideration:
>
> 1. Some bullet-points from an exchange between CSG and NCSG
> representatives outlining a potential draft process.
> 2. The latest version of the ICANN Staff Memo with a revised
> draft timeline and some relevant excerpts from Bylaws and GNSO
> Procedures.
> 3. A further excerpt from the Bylaws, with Section 11.3(f), which
> covers the selection process for Seats 13-14 (to the extent that
> is covered in the Bylaws), and Section 11.3(h), which is referred
> to in Section 11.3(f).
>
> A few thoughts and comments:
>
> A. We only have 10 1/2 weeks to both develop and go through a
> process that is contemplated to take 21 weeks (just to go
> through). Talk about building the airplane in the air.
>
> B. At the Intersessional, we discussed possible adjustments to
> the timeline, but did not come to any decisions. It's not clear
> to me whether Staff is preparing a further revised draft. I'll ask.
>
> C. If any of our groups have not already done so, we should put
> out a call for any other nominations ASAP (though it would be nice
> to know the end of the nomination period).
>
> D. Without making any judgments, the CPH process and the NCPH
> bullet-points are significantly different when it comes to voting.
>
> E. We should figure out how to get this process agreed as quickly
> as possible. Given the unusual circumstances, we don't need to
> use this process as precedent for any future process. We just
> need to get through this selection. One approach is for NCSG to
> respond to the draft sent at the end of the Intersessional.
> However, given the gap between that and the bullet-points, it
> might just be better to arrange a call/Adobe Connect session ASAP
> to move the ball forward.
>
> Thanks for reading,
>
> Greg
>
> P.S. It's not all that important how we got here, but
> nonetheless, it should be noted that the GNSO Procedures were
> never updated from 2012, when the Bylaws deadline for naming the
> Director was changed from one month to two months (briefly) and
> then six months prior to being seated. (The GNSO Procedures will
> need to be updated in any event, since the Bylaws references are
> now obsolete.)) The draft bullet-points repeated this error.
>
> B. Since we are doing this with very little time
>
>
>
>
> *Greg Shatan
> *C: 917-816-6428
> S: gsshatan
> Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428
> gregshatanipc at gmail.com <mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *Greg Shatan* <gregshatanipc at gmail.com
> <mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>>
> Date: Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 5:28 AM
> Subject: Discussion Draft of Interim Board Selection Process
> To: ncph-intersessional2017 at icann.org
> <mailto:ncph-intersessional2017 at icann.org>
>
>
> NCSG/NCUC/NPOC Intersessional Participants,
>
> The CSG prepared a "discussion draft" of a proposed interim Board
> Selection Process based closely on the Final Process adopted by
> the Contracted Parties House. Clean and marked drafts are
> attached, showing changes from the CPH document.
>
> A Google Docs version can be found here, where any suggested
> changes can be added in "suggest" mode (but everyone has "edit"
> rights):
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lx8jCTEWGAuPyPpnL_RaHGum4dQXf2a1MTyYXx8O9dc/edit?usp=sharing
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lx8jCTEWGAuPyPpnL_RaHGum4dQXf2a1MTyYXx8O9dc/edit?usp=sharing>
>
> We would hope to use this for the current 2017 Board Seat process
> and then revisit afterward before making it a permanent rather
> than "interim" process.
>
> This has not been reviewed by the membership of the IPC, BC and
> ISPCP, but we wanted to start the discussion on this basis, given
> the short amount of time we have for this year.
>
> We look forward to your thoughts.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Greg (on behalf of BC/IPC/ISPCP Intersessional Teams)
>
> *Greg Shatan
> *C: 917-816-6428 <tel:%28917%29%20816-6428>
> S: gsshatan
> Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428 <tel:%28646%29%20845-9428>
> gregshatanipc at gmail.com <mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncph-intersessional2017 mailing list
> Ncph-intersessional2017 at icann.org
> <mailto:Ncph-intersessional2017 at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ncph-intersessional2017
> <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ncph-intersessional2017>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
--
------------
Matthew Shears
Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
+ 44 771 2472987
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-ec/attachments/20170221/c740a571/attachment.htm>
More information about the NCSG-EC
mailing list