[EC-NCSG] Meeting with staff in LA on Fri

[Rudi Vansnick]

Dear Tapani,

I have no objection for the agenda. Regards the ombudsman I not convinced that we will have an added value with that debate. Perhaps a more interesting item could be : What are the expectations from ICANN staff regards the work volunteers in the SG/C are delivering ? I?m essentially looking towards the definition of what is staff?s responsibility and what are the volunteers responsibilities ? I think for newcomer this could help a lot in understanding what is expected from them.

My 2 cts 

Rudi Vansnick
Chair Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC)
www.npoc.org <http://www.npoc.org/>

rudi.vansnick at npoc.org
Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16
Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32



> Op 2 feb. 2016, om 10:39 heeft Tapani Tarvainen <ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info> het volgende geschreven:
> 
> Dead all,
> 
> We (NCSG) are having a meeting with staff in LA on Friday.
> 
> I've already asked constituency ECs and councillors for ideas
> what we'd like to talk and who from staff we'd want,
> so far not many concrete ideas but here're a few:
> 
> * Travel arrangements, visas &c: Joseph de Jesus 
> 
> * (1) DIDP request processing (2) how ICANN legal determines if a PDP is
>  within ICANN's mission: Sam Eisner or someone else from legal dept
> 
> * Ombudsman, what he and his office can and can't do for us
>  (suggested to bring Chris in remotely as he apparently won't be in LA)
> 
> * Generally, how could non-commercial volunteers and staff work
>  better together (who?)
> 
> Opinions, other ideas?
> 
> -- 
> Tapani Tarvainen
> 
> _______________________________________________
> EC-NCSG mailing list
> EC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/ec-ncsg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/ec-ncsg/attachments/20160203/b1b68699/attachment.html>