[EC-NCSG] follow-up for last confcall & setting up next call

Rafik Dammak rafik.dammak
Tue Mar 3 15:29:21 EET 2015


Hi Tapani,

I guess one workaround would be to find a validation or macro to add to the
google form to prevent such input, that need some investigation. in
meantime, explanation was added to the form to clarify that.

Rafik

2015-03-03 22:16 GMT+09:00 Tapani Tarvainen <ncuc at tapani.tarvainen.info>:

> On Mar 03 21:57, Rafik Dammak (rafik.dammak at gmail.com) wrote:
>
> >    - as follow-up of the last confcall we agreed to make decision about
> the
> >    new application form and get input : here the mockup
> >
> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1uPzS7nxQkGgndirN8JM_E067DXz42uXWKcBClxAd4KY/edit
> > .
> >    if there is no objection by 10th March, I think we can consider
> approve and
> >    get it online. if you have any problem to access, please contact
> Maryam
>
> One question: even when you select Individual, it still offers
> the choice to join NPOC. Is there a technical reason for that?
>
> One problem we've had in the past is that people are confused about
> that. If the invalid choice were removed from the form, it would help
> people realize they should have applied as an organization instead
> (like one case we had last time).
>
> --
> Tapani Tarvainen
>
> _______________________________________________
> EC-NCSG mailing list
> EC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/ec-ncsg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/ec-ncsg/attachments/20150303/1a807ffc/attachment.html>



More information about the NCSG-EC mailing list