[Ncsg-discuss] Review of Reviews update to GNSO

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi all,

Please find below updates from CCG on the Review of Reviews. It will be one
of the topics for ICANN85 and I expect  us to share our input on the draft
proposal.

Best,

Rafik

---------- Forwarded message ---------
***Sent on behalf of Sophie Hey and Osvaldo Novoa, GNSO Reps on the Review
of Reviews Team*



Dear all,



We have set out an update on the work of the Review of Reviews Cross
Community Group (CCG) ahead of ICANN85 and Prep Week. Please share this
with your respective memberships.



The work of the CCG is progressing well. We are on schedule to present a
draft proposal of a future Reviews Program at ICANN85 for community input
and feedback. As a reminder, our work plan has us presenting a final
proposal to the community at ICANN86, so now is the time to start paying
attention and sharing input if you haven't already!



As of now, the CCG will be proposing five reviews: CIP Assessment,
Structural Review, Review of Reviews, Ad Hoc Review, and Accountability &
Transparency/Bucket A. Please note, there are options for the objectives of
the Accountability & Transparency/Bucket A, and Structural Review, and the
CCG will be specifically seeking input on whether the community has a
preference between these options.



For those that are interested, the early version of our draft proposal is
available here https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bNrRxa2-BuO5SOjg9-mAfKmj8VhKydrBu3Kfq-J3I5Y/edit?tab=t.0
[docs.google.com]
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1bNrRxa2-BuO5SOjg9-mAfKmj8VhKydrBu3Kfq-J3I5Y/edit?tab=t.0__;!!PtGJab4!9dvSbt3QsMdDBHm289NJ7KSpsfdSDzQ44dgiIKDG1PpwHOzowU8t4cRNMy-o1ZdN4FxcKHTK7WMGpXq986E2928pFlKcng$>.
We ask that you do *not* provide comments directly into the document, as it
is a working document for the CCG. Rather, please share any input you have
via the inputonreviews at icann.org mailing list. We have already received
some input via the mailing list, from both individuals and groups, which we
have been considering during our regular meetings - you can view the
mailing list archives here
https://lists.icann.org/hyperkitty/list/inputonreviews@icann.org/
[lists.icann.org]
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.icann.org/hyperkitty/list/inputonreviews@icann.org/__;!!PtGJab4!9dvSbt3QsMdDBHm289NJ7KSpsfdSDzQ44dgiIKDG1PpwHOzowU8t4cRNMy-o1ZdN4FxcKHTK7WMGpXq986E292_6dl9aJQ$>.
This has also included the sender of the input speaking to the CCG, which
we are also using to remind you all that the CCG has a very flexible
Observer policy (sign up here
https://icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/CDOR/pages/464355519/Observers
[icann-community.atlassian.net]
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/CDOR/pages/464355519/Observers__;!!PtGJab4!9dvSbt3QsMdDBHm289NJ7KSpsfdSDzQ44dgiIKDG1PpwHOzowU8t4cRNMy-o1ZdN4FxcKHTK7WMGpXq986E2928t_LzWNQ$>).
As a reminder, if you don't share your input with the CCG, it can't be
considered by the CCG.



In preparation for ICANN85, we suggest that you and your groups consider
the following questions:

   1. Do you agree with the objectives and purpose of the proposed reviews
   set out in the table? Would you suggest any changes or clarifications?


   2. Are any reviews missing from the table, or is a review included that
   should not be?


   3. Is there anything in the table that does not make sense to you, and
   you want more clarity on?



Note, these questions are not exhaustive but are intended to serve as
prompts for your analysis and feedback on the draft to the CCG.



If you would like either of us (or one of the CCG co-chairs) to join your
SG/C meetings at ICANN85 to discuss the proposal in more detail and answer
questions, please let us know.



Osvaldo and Sophie
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20260219/b14ea011/attachment-0001.htm>