Please Comment: Our Second Human Rights Impact Assessment on GAC Communique

[James Gannon]

Fully agree and I think that this topic is clearly one that we have
advocated for consistently, now is not the time to derail that to be
honest, it's a nuanced topic that I don't believe an AI driven response to
should be relied upon to understand the history and detail here.

--

James

On Tue, Sep 23, 2025, 13:13 Johan Helsingius <
00001963cc94b85a-dmarc-request at listserv.syr.edu> wrote:

> On 23/09/2025 03:43, farzaneh badii wrote:
> > I don’t think it’s accurate to say we’re “one-sided.” Our role isn’t to
> > constantly compromise to appear “balanced.” Our role is to hold the line
> > on rights. That’s the contribution we make in this system.
>
> Indeed. GNSO as a whole should be balanced, but we help provide that
> balance by defending human rights against other interests. In doing
> that, we are pragmatic and try to find workable solutions.
>
> > I will make it clear in our HRIA that we are not against DNS abuse
> > mitigation and debunk that myth.
>
> Great!
>
>         Julf
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20250923/984cde9c/attachment.htm>