A brief update from me

[Peterking Quaye]

Hi Farzaneh,
Thanks for the update Farzaneh . and all the best in the deliberation
good luck.

Kind regards
Peterking

On Sun, 19 Jan 2025, 4:07 pm Anriette Esterhuysen, <anriette at apc.org> wrote:

> Farzi.. thanks from me too!
>
> Very helpful and interesting.
>
> Anriette
>
> Anriette Esterhuysen - anriette at apc.org//anriette at gmail.com
> Senior advisor internet governance
> Association for Progressive Communicationswww.apc.org // afrisig.org
>
> On 2025/01/14 09:09, Benjamin Akinmoyeje wrote:
>
> Dear Farzi,
> Thank you for sharing these updates. It makes following GNSO council
> activities easy to follow.
>
> Good job.
>
> Kind regards,
> Benjamin
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 6:29 PM farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> The councilors are on their way to attend the council strategic meeting
>> in DC. (i am one of your councilors -north america) if you don’t know what
>> the GNSO council is, you can ask me off the mailing list.
>>
>> The past two months we have had two meetings and in general there are a
>> few issues that NCSG is monitoring and raising:
>> 1) forming an IG group in the council. This is needed to clarify to the
>> different UN and regional processes how we do our work and how we are
>> contributing to the stability and security of the Internet and keeping it
>> global.
>>
>> 2) billing contact of domain name registrant: this is a small issue but
>> at the same time it’s important. Billing contact should not be one of the
>> data elements that the data registration policy applies to. This is a
>> message we are trying to send to the council as there are some questions
>> raised as to how to resolve this during implementation (related to privacy
>> rights concerns)
>>
>> 3) ICANN has come up with a compliance report after the bilateral
>> amendments on dns abuse mitigation. The report is very quantitative talking
>> about how many pieces of abuse was detected how many domain names were
>> taken down and suspended. This is due to the nature of the amendments that
>> do not prescribe how registrars should deal with the mitigation and what
>> sort of processes they should have. While we don’t want to impose that on
>> the registrars and involve ICANN compliance we might want to weigh in on
>> the report and discuss qualitative measures that registrars should
>> consider. We also might want to comment on how to enhance the transparency
>> of the compliance reports on this if necessary.  Here is the report:
>>
>> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/icann-enforcement-of-dns-abuse-mitigation-requirements-08nov24-en.pdf (rights
>> that could be impacted: access to domain name, freedom of speech)
>>
>>
>> Farzaneh
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20250121/133eb86d/attachment.htm>