A brief update from me

[Anriette Esterhuysen]

Farzi.. thanks from me too!

Very helpful and interesting.

Anriette

Anriette Esterhuysen -anriette at apc.org//anriette at gmail.com
Senior advisor internet governance
Association for Progressive Communications
www.apc.org // afrisig.org

On 2025/01/14 09:09, Benjamin Akinmoyeje wrote:
> Dear Farzi,
> Thank you for sharing these updates. It makes following GNSO council 
> activities easy to follow.
>
> Good job.
>
> Kind regards,
> Benjamin
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 6:29 PM farzaneh badii 
> <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>     Hi all
>
>     The councilors are on their way to attend the council strategic
>     meeting in DC. (i am one of your councilors -north america) if you
>     don’t know what the GNSO council is, you can ask me off the
>     mailing list.
>
>     The past two months we have had two meetings and in general there
>     are a few issues that NCSG is monitoring and raising:
>     1) forming an IG group in the council. This is needed to clarify
>     to the different UN and regional processes how we do our work and
>     how we are contributing to the stability and security of the
>     Internet and keeping it global.
>
>     2) billing contact of domain name registrant: this is a small
>     issue but at the same time it’s important. Billing contact should
>     not be one of the data elements that the data registration policy
>     applies to. This is a message we are trying to send to the council
>     as there are some questions raised as to how to resolve this
>     during implementation (related to privacy rights concerns)
>
>     3) ICANN has come up with a compliance report after the bilateral
>     amendments on dns abuse mitigation. The report is very
>     quantitative talking about how many pieces of abuse was detected
>     how many domain names were taken down and suspended. This is due
>     to the nature of the amendments that do not prescribe how
>     registrars should deal with the mitigation and what sort of
>     processes they should have. While we don’t want to impose that on
>     the registrars and involve ICANN compliance we might want to weigh
>     in on the report and discuss qualitative measures that registrars
>     should consider. We also might want to comment on how to enhance
>     the transparency of the compliance reports on this if necessary. 
>     Here is the report:
>     https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/icann-enforcement-of-dns-abuse-mitigation-requirements-08nov24-en.pdf (rights
>     that could be impacted: access to domain name, freedom of speech)
>
>
>     Farzaneh
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20250119/5250b086/attachment.htm>