A brief update from me

[Poncelet Ileleji]

Thank you Farzi,

Appreciated for sharing the IG group at council well needed especially in
view of the GDC and WSIS and how the UN Tech Envoy officehas transitioned
into Digital and Emerging Technologies (ODET).  Looking to see this group
initiated

Appreciated for the update

Poncelet

*Poncelet O. Ileleji*

*Jokkolabs Banjul -  Lead / CEO*
*Sait Matty Road, Bakau, Adjacent to Swedish Consulate*
*KMC, The Gambia*
*P O Box 4496 Bakau,KMC, The Gambia*
*Skype: pons_utd*
*Tel Direct Office: +220 4495115*

*Tel Mobile/Whatsapp: +220 9912508*

*LinkedIn: Jokkolabs Banjul*
*Facebook: Jokkolabs Banjul*
*Twitter: @jBanjul*




On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 4:29 PM farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi all
>
> The councilors are on their way to attend the council strategic meeting in
> DC. (i am one of your councilors -north america) if you don’t know what the
> GNSO council is, you can ask me off the mailing list.
>
> The past two months we have had two meetings and in general there are a
> few issues that NCSG is monitoring and raising:
> 1) forming an IG group in the council. This is needed to clarify to the
> different UN and regional processes how we do our work and how we are
> contributing to the stability and security of the Internet and keeping it
> global.
>
> 2) billing contact of domain name registrant: this is a small issue but at
> the same time it’s important. Billing contact should not be one of the data
> elements that the data registration policy applies to. This is a message we
> are trying to send to the council as there are some questions raised as to
> how to resolve this during implementation (related to privacy rights
> concerns)
>
> 3) ICANN has come up with a compliance report after the bilateral
> amendments on dns abuse mitigation. The report is very quantitative talking
> about how many pieces of abuse was detected how many domain names were
> taken down and suspended. This is due to the nature of the amendments that
> do not prescribe how registrars should deal with the mitigation and what
> sort of processes they should have. While we don’t want to impose that on
> the registrars and involve ICANN compliance we might want to weigh in on
> the report and discuss qualitative measures that registrars should
> consider. We also might want to comment on how to enhance the transparency
> of the compliance reports on this if necessary.  Here is the report:
>
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/icann-enforcement-of-dns-abuse-mitigation-requirements-08nov24-en.pdf (rights
> that could be impacted: access to domain name, freedom of speech)
>
>
> Farzaneh
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20250113/41a35850/attachment.htm>