A brief update from me

[farzaneh badii]

Thanks Pascal

Happy new year

Of course the point of the group is to monitor and contribute to those
processes and not interfere with.

Farzaneh


On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 11:51 AM Pascal Bekono <pbekono at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear Farza,
>
> Happy new year and thank you for this update.
>
> It's good to see the latest achievement. Concerning the IG group in
> council, I would like to know if its objectives will not interfere with the
> WSIS20 WG, as it appears to work also on different UN and regional
> processes.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Le lun. 13 janv. 2025 à 17:29, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> a écrit :
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> The councilors are on their way to attend the council strategic meeting
>> in DC. (i am one of your councilors -north america) if you don’t know what
>> the GNSO council is, you can ask me off the mailing list.
>>
>> The past two months we have had two meetings and in general there are a
>> few issues that NCSG is monitoring and raising:
>> 1) forming an IG group in the council. This is needed to clarify to the
>> different UN and regional processes how we do our work and how we are
>> contributing to the stability and security of the Internet and keeping it
>> global.
>>
>> 2) billing contact of domain name registrant: this is a small issue but
>> at the same time it’s important. Billing contact should not be one of the
>> data elements that the data registration policy applies to. This is a
>> message we are trying to send to the council as there are some questions
>> raised as to how to resolve this during implementation (related to privacy
>> rights concerns)
>>
>> 3) ICANN has come up with a compliance report after the bilateral
>> amendments on dns abuse mitigation. The report is very quantitative talking
>> about how many pieces of abuse was detected how many domain names were
>> taken down and suspended. This is due to the nature of the amendments that
>> do not prescribe how registrars should deal with the mitigation and what
>> sort of processes they should have. While we don’t want to impose that on
>> the registrars and involve ICANN compliance we might want to weigh in on
>> the report and discuss qualitative measures that registrars should
>> consider. We also might want to comment on how to enhance the transparency
>> of the compliance reports on this if necessary.  Here is the report:
>>
>> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/icann-enforcement-of-dns-abuse-mitigation-requirements-08nov24-en.pdf (rights
>> that could be impacted: access to domain name, freedom of speech)
>>
>>
>> Farzaneh
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20250113/dc1fa582/attachment.htm>