[GNSO-SOI-TF] Please respond - TF follow up questions

[Jean F. Quéralt]

Hi Farzaneh.

(Re: "Oh I made a mistake and wrong thread! I am not gonna read the wiki
page! I will read our SOI statement. :) )

Thanks for that :-)
How did it go?

Best,
Jean F. Queralt
Founder & CEO - The IO Foundation <http://www.TheIOFoundation.org>
Book a meeting <http://TIOF.Click/BookJFQ> (30 minutes)


On Sat, 11 Mar 2023 at 23:14, Jean F. Quéralt <JFQueralt at theiofoundation.org>
wrote:

> I actually think it's moderate enough.
>
> Small polishes:
>
> *The ICANN Statement of Interest (SOI) is a part of the crucial
> transparency governance mechanisms that help with healthy policymaking.
> ICANN policymaking processes are public and anybody can get involved. When
> involved with public policy making we need to know who is representing
> whose interest to avoid capture by the few powerful actors. Asking for
> confidentiality in SOIs endangers the integrity of the policymaking
> processes and makes it prone to capture. Attorney-client privilege should
> not apply to public policy making. If clients are not willing to be
> disclosed, they should not be represented.*
>
> Thx Farzaneh.
>
> Jean F. Queralt
> Founder & CEO - The IO Foundation <http://www.TheIOFoundation.org>
> Book a meeting <http://TIOF.Click/BookJFQ> (30 minutes)
>
>
> On Sat, 11 Mar 2023 at 22:56, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> How about this:
>>
>> The ICANN Statement of Interest is a part of the crucial transparency
>> governance mechanisms that help with healthy policymaking. ICANN
>> policymaking processes are public and anybody can get involved. When
>> involved with public policy making we need to know who is representing
>> whose interest to avoid capture by the few powerful actors. Asking for
>> confidentiality in SOI endangers the integrity of the policymaking
>> processes and makes it prone to capture. attorney-client privilege  should
>> not apply to public policy making. If clients are not willing to be
>> disclosed, they should not be represented.
>>
>> We can make it a bit more moderate! Welcoming Suggestions
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 3:20 PM Tomslin Samme-Nlar <mesumbeslin at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The idea of a one paragraph statement sounds like a good idea at the
>>> GNSO Townhall. Yes, there will be one.
>>>
>>> Warmly,
>>> Tomslin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 at 04:24, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We can write a one paragraph statement and ask the representative to
>>>> discuss? Is there a GNSO Townhall in Cancun, we can talk about it there as
>>>> well.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 12:19 PM Johan Helsingius <julf at julf.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 28/02/2023 17:41, farzaneh badii wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > Let's talk to the contracted parties about this as well. Seems like
>>>>> we
>>>>> > are on the same side on this issue
>>>>>
>>>>> They are. But they seem to be wondering why we haven't spoken up.
>>>>>
>>>>>         Julf
>>>>>
>>>> --
>> Farzaneh
>>
>

-- 
**DISCLAIMER**
*The content of this message, which may contain personal or 
sensitive data, is confidential. If you have received it by mistake, please 
inform the sender by replying to the email and then permanently delete the 
message, including any attachments. It is forbidden to copy, forward or in 
any way reveal the content of this message to anyone. The integrity and 
security of this email cannot be guaranteed over the Internet and, 
therefore, the sender will not be held liable for any damage caused by the 
message.*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20230312/5eb6e53e/attachment.htm>