Transfer fee and sanctions

[KASWESHA]

Hi Plommer! I'm glad to see you are still active in the forum. On my side I
got tired when I realized that, some intended to personalize the and own
the process, so I decided to mute and and watch from a far like an
observer. I respect each and every member and I have no grudge.

On Mon, Feb 20, 2023, 4:18 AM Raoul Plommer <plommer at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Farzi, you know damn well I took that responsibility off you, after being
> an observer and trying to ask you to let me cover for you when you couldn't
> make it to meetings - I got zero response from you for these requests, I
> made those a few times. It was like talking to a brick wall. Definitely not
> a great intro for working as a representative of the NCSG - there was zero
> interest from you to help me (a newbie to policy work) and to be honest, I
> find it a little insulting that you publicly claim here you didn't know who
> is taking this responsibility from you. I find it suspicious that you're
> trying to make it seem that you have no knowledge of this but really can't
> fathom how this kind of behavior is positively serving the NCSG and its
> members. I guess that is somewhat in line with making no effort whatsoever
> to give me any idea of what's happening in the group or what to look out
> for. It is no small wonder there are not too many new people trying to do
> policy work for NCSG. I also sent you a reply to your first mail in this
> thread, confronting you about this dishonesty, and unsurprisingly, didn't
> get a reply then either.
>
> I've tried to understand the issues of the TPR but like I told Tomslin
> already in November, I found it overwhelming and that was BEFORE they made
> these 90 minute meetings bi-weekly. I asked for additional seats in
> exchange for this change into a EPDP, (at least schedule wise) in the TPR
> group, but my comment was found to be "interesting" and swiftly ignored
> after that.
>
> Perhaps you could tell me, was the price of the transfer in scope in the
> past Transfer Process Policy? I have not heard of any discussion of the
> transfer price or sanctions in the meetings I've attended, I've tried my
> best to attend at least weekly but I have not been able to do that every
> single week.
>
> Tomslin, I can not attend the NCSG policy calls, since I'm always working
> at that time. I think for Juan it will be even harder, because that's like
> 4 or 5 am for his timezone. I gotta say, that time should be rotated
> somewhat. I could make 13 UTC at best, but not a minute before.
>
> In all honesty, I've received zero guidance and have not been able to
> produce a report for the NCSG. All the sessions I've attended have been
> about nitty gritty details on timestamps, reactions and counter reactions
> with the registrant and the registrar. I've felt that I haven't had much to
> say about those mechanics.
>
> I do not mind at all, if somebody wants to have a go at it, as I said, I
> aired my anxiety about being the rep in November and nothing has changed
> for the positive since then. The amount of meetings per week has doubled.
>
> -Raoul
>
> On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 at 10:34, Tomslin Samme-Nlar <mesumbeslin at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Farzaneh.
>>
>> The current reps are Juan and Raoul.
>>
>> I had requested that they provide an update during this month's policy
>> call but they both couldn't make it. So perhaps they could add some context
>> here on email regarding the report and the items you'vecalled out. The
>> report acknowledges that those were non-commercial concerns, so I am sure
>> they must have been discussed with our reps.
>>
>> Warmly,
>> Tomslin
>>
>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2023, 09:37 farzaneh badii, <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> NCSG,
>>>
>>> I am not the representative on TRP anymore (I don't know who is). But we
>>> did raise a few issues of our own when I was representing NCSG. Those
>>> included hefty transfer fees, and sanctions. Both of these issues were
>>> deemed either out of scope of the transfer working group or were
>>> acknowledged that it should be done more holistically. I am pretty
>>> disappointed on behalf of all of us to be honest. Report attached.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Farzaneh
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20230220/964ae6d5/attachment.htm>