NomCom rebalancing

Rafik Dammak rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM
Mon Sep 19 03:55:18 EEST 2022


Hi Julf,


As far as I recall Nomcom review was done by independent reviewer sharing
recommendatioms then there was the working party for the implementation. I
think there was discussion with working party and GNSO counterparts
regarding the related recommendation and rebalancing.

Holistic review is a recommendation from ATRT3 and not applied yet, there
is talk about ToS for public comments currently.

Best,

Rafik

On Mon, Sep 19, 2022, 17:43 Johan Helsingius <julf at julf.com> wrote:

> On 19-09-2022 16:05, Emmanuel Vitus wrote:
>
> > I think the next step will be a
> > strong  written recommendation and action plan to the board.
>
> Maybe wait until we have had some more discussions with Avri and
> Matthew about how to proceed - I think the Board would be more
> favorable to a situation where they can be allowed to respond to
> a clearly defined problem rather than being told what to do :)
>
> Meanwhile let's line up our ducks. Hopefully someone still knows
> the history in enough detail. The obvious points where this
> could have been fixed were the NomCom review and the holistic
> review and their implementations. Did we have anyone involved
> in those?
>
>         Julf
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20220919/aab24958/attachment.htm>


More information about the Ncsg-discuss mailing list