ICANN Comments to EDPB and content regulation

[Raphael Beauregard-Lacroix]

Thank you Farzaneh and Bruna. Could easily have flown under the radar and
forgotten after Christmas. This is certainly an important matter. Looks
typical in its language: putting various kinds of processing as matters of
"necessity" without looking into purpose and context of such processing.
ICANN is no "surveillance capitalist," but precisely if it sticks to its
narrow mandate and to appropriately, narrowly designed processing, it will
also steer clear of any form of trouble with (most) DPAs and their related
statutes. Now, if it starts giving in to pressures by certain interests to
stop the "social harm" of fake gucci bags (hmm...), well, we get that kind
of letter, I suppose.

I'd be happy to help on the matter.

Have a nice day!

On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 10:27 AM Bruna Martins dos Santos <
bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thank you so much for raising this here Farz.  I will definitely mention
> this topic when I have my next interaction with Goran.
>
> About the Content Moderation part, I agree with you that this topic might
> be absolutely out of the scope of the SSAD and ICANN as well. And this has
> been a point this community has raised before - more than just once and
> about Whois and CoMo. I also happen to agree that the definitions of
> Illegal content and content related to societal harm are rather open and
> problematic for the SSAD - or for many other discussions as well.
>
> Should we work on a letter - to the Board, the EPDB or both - reviving our
> arguments about Whois and Content moderation and send it once again ? Are
> there any volunteers who would like help me with this ?
>
> Best,
> Bruna
>
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 12:00 PM farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> In my spare time, I got to read ICANN's letter dated 21 December 2020 to
>> EDPB about compliance with GDPR.
>>
>>
>> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/icann-org-comments-edpb-recs-21dec20-en.pdf
>>
>> There was one alarming issue raised in this letter, and since the
>> Internet community has been mentioned, I think we should at least ask Bruna
>> to raise it with the CEO next time she talks to him. I know we
>> haven't drafted other  important comments but I haven't followed EPDP so
>> will leave that to the members.
>>
>> P.2: "The SSAD is therefore instrumental for stopping and preventing the
>> *dissemination of illegal content and in order to avoid related societal
>> harm*s". This is alarming because the SSAD is serving ICANN's mission
>> which has nothing to do with the regulation of illegal content and that is
>> outside of its mission. I don't know what they mean by societal harm. We
>> have many times told ICANN not to be careless when it comes to the limited
>> function of WHOIS and relate it to content regulation. They said they
>> wouldn't. But here they are definitely going into those territories.
>>
>> There are other matters in the letter as well but I haven't had the time
>> to read closely, for example they are talking about "thick WHOIS" not
>> happening because of the strict international transfer. I am not sure where
>> epdp is at with discussing thick whois. Can we even have it in place?
>>
>>
>> Best
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Farzaneh
>>
>
>
> --
> *Bruna Martins dos Santos *
>
> Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
> @boomartins
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20210107/cfea72c9/attachment.htm>