Congratulations and a reminder

[Joy Liddicoat]

Congratulations to the successful appointees, wonderful news.

Those suggested Board topics look good, thanks Stephanie

Joy Liddicoat

On 4/10/2020 9:53 am, Olivier Kouami wrote:
> Congratulations to all the appointees.
> They deserve it.
> Keep up the great work.
> Kudo !
> Warm regards
> Olévié
>
> Le sam. 3 oct. 2020 à 14:19, Stephanie E Perrin 
> <stephanie at digitaldiscretion.ca 
> <mailto:stephanie at digitaldiscretion.ca>> a écrit :
>
>     Congratulations to all those appointed yesterday by the Nomcom, it
>     is particularly great news to see Avri Doria and Sara Deutsch
>     reappointed to the Board, and of current Councillor James Gannon
>     to the PTI Board.
>     https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2020-10-02-en. .
>     <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2020-10-02-en>
>
>     While I have your attention, may I please remind you that we have
>     to have proposals for topics to discuss withe the Board by
>     Monday.  So far, noone has proposed anything except Kathy Kleiman,
>     who thinks (as I do) that a discussion of the new google format
>     for seeking comments may be a good topic.  I don't know about the
>     rest of you, but I find this new format, while helpful to staff in
>     compiling comments, restricts the ambit of comment and may lead to
>     bias. It is also a nightmare to navigate, in my opinion, having
>     had a difficult time following the EPDP comments.  I am about to
>     review the comment on Sub Pro (Here is the form:
>     https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-draft-final-report-2020-08-20-en
>     <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-draft-final-report-2020-08-20-en>)
>     and I expect it to be a painful experience as well.  Don't let my
>     grumbling deter you though, please take a look at what has been
>     submitted on this important topic, available here
>     https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VOCuHrCIWc3D9aJV2-woOob8atmg6o20AzE7NMse5CE/edit#gid=472588409
>     <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VOCuHrCIWc3D9aJV2-woOob8atmg6o20AzE7NMse5CE/edit#gid=472588409>.
>
>     In the absence of other suggestions coming from members, I am
>     going to propose discussing the results of ICANN investment and
>     participation in the Internet and Jurisdiction project.  Members
>     may be aware that ICANN has participated at the Board level in
>     this interesting work, and while I have no figures for the
>     financial investment, it must be significant, judging from the
>     level of participation of staff and the Board.  The problem of
>     jurisdiction and choice of law remains one of those hardy
>     perennials, we certainly had it arise in the context of the EPDP,
>     and the recent Schrems II decision
>     (https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2020-07/cp200091en.pdf
>     <https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2020-07/cp200091en.pdf>)
>     and the US White Paper response to that decision
>     (https://www.commerce.gov/sites/default/files/2020-09/SCCsWhitePaperFORMATTEDFINAL508COMPLIANT.PDF
>     <https://www.commerce.gov/sites/default/files/2020-09/SCCsWhitePaperFORMATTEDFINAL508COMPLIANT.PDF>)
>     brings the issue of transborder dataflow back into focus. I
>     realize this is not everyone's interest, but it is mine, and if
>     you are not going to suggest anything, this is what I propose to
>     inquire about.
>
>     Kind regards.
>
>     Stephanie Perrin
>
>     NCSG Chair
>
>
-- 
Joy Liddicoat
@internetrights

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20201004/e5c88c76/attachment.htm>