Congratulations and a reminder

Olivier Kouami olivierkouami at GMAIL.COM
Sat Oct 3 15:53:32 EEST 2020


Congratulations to all the appointees.
They deserve it.
Keep up the great work.
Kudo !
Warm regards
Olévié

Le sam. 3 oct. 2020 à 14:19, Stephanie E Perrin <
stephanie at digitaldiscretion.ca> a écrit :

> Congratulations to all those appointed yesterday by the Nomcom, it is
> particularly great news to see Avri Doria and Sara Deutsch reappointed to
> the Board, and of current Councillor James Gannon to the PTI Board.   https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2020-10-02-en.
> .
> <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2020-10-02-en>
>
> While I have your attention, may I please remind you that we have to have
> proposals for topics to discuss withe the Board by Monday.  So far, noone
> has proposed anything except Kathy Kleiman, who thinks (as I do) that a
> discussion of the new google format for seeking comments may be a good
> topic.  I don't know about the rest of you, but I find this new format,
> while helpful to staff in compiling comments, restricts the ambit of
> comment and may lead to bias. It is also a nightmare to navigate, in my
> opinion, having had a difficult time following the EPDP comments.  I am
> about to review the comment on Sub Pro (Here is the form:
> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-draft-final-report-2020-08-20-en)
> and I expect it to be a painful experience as well.  Don't let my grumbling
> deter you though, please take a look at what has been submitted on this
> important topic, available here
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VOCuHrCIWc3D9aJV2-woOob8atmg6o20AzE7NMse5CE/edit#gid=472588409
> .
>
> In the absence of other suggestions coming from members, I am going to
> propose discussing the results of ICANN investment and participation in the
> Internet and Jurisdiction project.  Members may be aware that ICANN has
> participated at the Board level in this interesting work, and while I have
> no figures for the financial investment, it must be significant, judging
> from the level of participation of staff and the Board.  The problem of
> jurisdiction and choice of law remains one of those hardy perennials, we
> certainly had it arise in the context of the EPDP, and the recent Schrems
> II decision (
> https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2020-07/cp200091en.pdf)
> and the US White Paper response to that decision (
> https://www.commerce.gov/sites/default/files/2020-09/SCCsWhitePaperFORMATTEDFINAL508COMPLIANT.PDF)
> brings the issue of transborder dataflow back into focus.  I realize this
> is not everyone's interest, but it is mine, and if you are not going to
> suggest anything, this is what I propose to inquire about.
>
> Kind regards.
>
> Stephanie Perrin
>
> NCSG Chair
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20201003/cadbd33b/attachment.htm>


More information about the Ncsg-discuss mailing list