[Public Comments] Call for Volunteers for NCSG Comment on Draft PTI FY21-24 Strategic Plan

Amr Elsadr aelsadr at ICANNPOLICY.NINJA
Wed May 27 06:41:34 EEST 2020


Interesting stuff, Tomslin. Thanks. Do you have a link to the recording of that webinar handy?

Thanks again.

Amr

> On May 26, 2020, at 6:15 AM, Tomslin Samme-Nlar <mesumbeslin at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> MM: Are they telling us ICANN is not providing adequate financial support?
>
> From listening to the webinar on the strategic plan, this is what the president warns they are NOT saying. My understanding of what they are saying is that they are resource limited, since they depend on funding allocation from ICANN. So the risk exists that community expectations might not be aligned with the budget allocated to them.
>
> Cheers,
> Tomslin
>
> On Mon., 25 May 2020, 02:17 Mueller, Milton L, <milton at gatech.edu> wrote:
>
>> This part also struck my eye:
>>
>> AMR: Another community-related risk identified is the concern that PTI will be unable to meet all the community’s “expectations and community deliverables due to dependency on ICANN Operating Plan and Budget”. Again…, I don’t know if this is actually an issue, or not, but they’ve flagged it, so worth looking in to. If ICANN’s Operating Plan and Budget is a constraint on PTI’s ability to perform the IANA functions to the satisfaction of its customers, then something will clearly need to be done about it. If it is an exaggeration, and things may proceed without incident, then grand. I really don’t know, but I’m sure others here do.
>>
>> MM: Are they telling us ICANN is not providing adequate financial support?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20200527/b6407bd5/attachment.htm>


More information about the Ncsg-discuss mailing list