A Proposal to Merge NCSG, NCUC and NPOC for More Efficiency in ICANN=?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=99s_?=DNS Work

[James Gannon]

In the last election we had 240 voters. Of which I would estimate 15% are actually involved in any work.

Sent from my iPhone

>> On 11 Jul 2020, at 14:53, Sam Lanfranco <lanfran at yorku.ca> wrote:
> 
> Dorothy, et. al.,
> 
> I could be way off on membership. Better indicators are active participation and voter turnout. 
> The ICANNWiki pages for NCSG, NCUC are one or two years out of date. NCSC claims 500 members 
> The NPOC ICANNWiki page is up to data and links to a list of 100 members. 
> 
> Not counting those who are just NCSG members we are in the 600 claimed member range.
> Without diminishing the heroic work of NCSG/NCUC/NPOC volunteers, that still leaves us a
> weak leg on the ICANN multistakeholder stool. 
> 
> Sam 
> ---- Original Message ----
> From: dorothy g <dgdorothydg at GMAIL.COM>
> To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
> Sent: Sat, Jul 11, 2020, 9:29 AM
> Subject: Re: A Proposal to Merge NCSG, NCUC and NPOC for More Efficiency in ICANN’s DNS Work
> 
> I agree.  If someone could help us with a table of pros and cons
> I was also surprised that the total membership is only around 300?
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20200711/e98af431/attachment.htm>