A Proposal to Merge NCSG, NCUC and NPOC for More Efficiency in ICANN=?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=99s_?=DNS Work

[Sam Lanfranco]

Dorothy, et. al.,
I could be way off on membership. Better indicators are active
participation and voter turnout. 

The ICANNWiki pages for NCSG, NCUC are one or two years out of date. NCSC
claims 500 members 

The NPOC ICANNWiki page is up to data and links to a list of 100 members. 
Not counting those who are just NCSG members we are in the 600 claimed
member range.
Without diminishing the heroic work of NCSG/NCUC/NPOC volunteers, that
still leaves us a
weak leg on the ICANN multistakeholder stool. 
Sam 
---- Original Message ----
From: dorothy g 
To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Sent: Sat, Jul 11, 2020, 9:29 AM
Subject: Re: A Proposal to Merge NCSG, NCUC and NPOC for More Efficiency in
ICANN’s DNS Work

I agree.  If someone could help us with a table of pros and consI was also
surprised that the total membership is only around 300?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20200711/182c5e9a/attachment.htm>