ATRT3

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Wolfgang,

thanks for this update and summary.
As the ATRT3 has/had quite short time to review the public comments and
aiming to deliver final report and recommendations by end of March which is
roughly 6 weeks , what are the remaining tasks for the ATRT3, what is the
status regarding the consensus designation or/and the ATRT is envisioning
to make an substantive changes to the recommendations presented at the
public comments?

Best,

Rafik


Le mer. 12 févr. 2020 à 01:10, Wolfgang Kleinwächter <
wolfgang at kleinwaechter.info> a écrit :

> Hi,
>
> as a GNSO/NCSG rep in the ATRT 3 team I want to update where we are in the
> process:
>
> During the last weekend we had our "final meeting" (in ICANN´s office in
> Brussels) where we went through the comments from ICANN community members
> and stakeholder groups, after our draft report (220+ pages) was put to
> public comment in December 2019. We got many very useful comments from a
> many corners of the ICANN ecosystem (in total more than 100 pages). We went
> through all comments page by page and included as much as possible in the
> new version of the final report and the set of recommendations we have to
> give to the ICANN board. If you will compare the December 2019 version with
> the new version, you will see a lot of enhancements. We had extensive
> disucussions, inter alia, how a "prioritization process" could be organized
> and how the future of the complex review processes within ICANN coud be
> made more efficient, to avoid community burn out by leaving the oversight
> over ICANN´s multistakeholder and multisectoral activities, and in
> particular the activities of the ICANN board, in the hand of the empowered
> community.
>
> The revised draft report will be available in Cancun for some final
> discussions. The plan is to deliver the final version to ICANN on March
> 31st, 2020. ATRT3 started on April 1, 2019. Within this one year we had
> next to our F2F meetings 45 telcos, interviews and individual consultations
> with many community members. We reached out as much as we could  and we
> reached our aim, to finalize our work within the given time frame without
> any need for a further extension. There will be a blog post soon. I hope
> that the outcome of the report will be useful for the further development
> of ICANN as a whole. We tried to develop SMART recommenations (specific,
> meaningful, achievable, realistic, time bound). And we hope that the report
> will contribute to more transparency and higher accountability.
>
> It was an interesting experience to work within this great
> multistakeholder team, co-chaired by CLO and Pat Kane. We had also great
> support from ICANN Org, in particular Jennifer and Negir did a great job.
>
> This ends my reporting back to the NCSG. I tried to represent the ideas
> and values of the NCSC as much as I could. Thanks for your support.
>
> Wolfgang
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20200211/e4350f14/attachment.htm>