Auction proceeds CCWG - Final Survey on Mechanisms

[Bruna Martins dos Santos]

Hey Julf,

Thanks for sending us the poll!

Since the mechanism C is pretty much off the table, would there be space
for the implementation of Mechanism A with some level of community
oversight - apart from the oversight we already do -? Im thinking that,
maybe, such oversight can be implemented through the empowered community or
a clearer mandate of this yet to be created internal department stating
that it would need to take into consideration community advice in a more
enforced way...
Also, I am a bit behind on this discussion, but I am also understanding
that mechanism B is not entirely this community oversight im referring to,
but more on the grounds of an external auditor, is that correct ?

best,
Bruna



Le jeu. 23 avr. 2020 à 04:14, lists at icann.guru <lists at icann.guru> a écrit :

> Hey Julf,
>
> So sorry to be clearer, I support sending one mechanism to the board.
>
> In terms of which mechanism I prefer C.
> If C is off the table I would go with A as I think the collaboration model
> introduced too much complexity and admin overhead when it comes to reality,
> and I am of the opinion that it would bring additional risks to the
> disbursement of the funds within ICANN mission.
>
> *---*
> *James Gannon*
>
> On 13/04/2020 19:27:33, Johan Helsingius <julf at julf.com> wrote:
> I hope everybody is staying safe and healthy.
>
> The auction proceeds CCWG is asking for a response to this poll by
> Friday, April 24:
>
> https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/SRHH2L5
>
> Do we, as NCSG, at this point, have a position on these questions:
>
> 4. Are you of the view that the CCWG should only recommend one mechanism
> for ICANN Board consideration, even if your preferred mechanism does not
> come out as the preferred mechanism of the CCWG overall?
>
> A) Yes, the CCWG should only recommend one mechanism to the ICANN Board.
>
> B) No, the CCWG should recommend the top two ranked mechanisms to the
> ICANN Board and have the ICANN Board make the final determination, as
> long as the other CCWG recommendations are followed.
>
> C) No, the CCWG should recommend all three remaining mechanisms and have
> the ICANN Board make the final determination, as long as the other CCWG
> recommendations are followed.
>
> 5. Please rank the three remaining mechanisms in your order of
> preference, with 1 being the preferred mechanism to recommend to the
> ICANN Board.
>
> A) Mechanism A: An internal department dedicated to the allocation of
> auction proceeds is created within the ICANN organization.
>
> B) Mechanism B: An internal department dedicated to the allocation of
> auction proceeds is created within the ICANN organization which
> collaborates with an existing non-profit.
>
> C) Mechanism C: A new charitable structure (ICANN Foundation) is created
> which is functionally separate from ICANN org, which would be
> responsible for the allocation of auction proceeds.
>
> Julf
>
>

-- 
*Bruna Martins dos Santos *

Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
@boomartins
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20200423/0acaecb5/attachment.htm>