ICANN has sent a letter to ISOC

[hvale vale]

Agree, it sound so boringly repetitive of collusive and corrupted way of
doing things.

Bluntly pretend they do not know or see anything meaningful about timing
and personality involved.

hv

On 12/10/19 4:51 PM, Caleb Olumuyiwa Ogundele wrote:
> What baffles me is the concern on the timeline. For emphasis... The
> timeline and how ICANN is also trying to protect her image from the
> body language of the letter and blog. To put in perspective see below:
>
> 1. Andrew Sulivan informed ISOC Chapter Delegates on: *November 14, 2019*
>
> According to the letter published by ICANN general counsel it says:
>
> 2. "*On 14 November 2019*, PIR formally notified ICANN of the proposed
> transaction. Under the .ORG Registry Agreement, PIR must
> obtain ICANN’s prior approval before any transaction that would result
> in a change of control of the registry operator. Typically, similar
> requests to ICANN are confidential; we asked PIR for permission to
> publish the notification and they declined our request."
>
> If I understand correctly, this notice should have been filed earlier
> to ICANN (at least 30 days notice) before making a public notice os
> such acquisition? I might be miss something here?
>
> The fact that PIR failed to give a prior notice itself is a breach of
> the agreement to nullify the transaction.
>
> By the way, why did ICANN wait till the pressure was high in the wind
> before making a public statement?
>
> Caleb Ogundele
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 4:02 PM Sam Lanfranco <lanfran at yorku.ca
> <mailto:lanfran at yorku.ca>> wrote:
>
>     All,
>     Just For the Record, I have entered the following personal comment
>     into the COMMENTS section for the letter at:  
>     https://www.icann.org/news/blog/org-update
>
>     As a stakeholder in the .org community, and member of NCSG/NPOC
>     there are a number of issues that concern me here, but a major one
>     is that while Ethos Capital is making promises about the future,
>     there is no track record for the newly formed Ethos, or evidence
>     of expertise in the registry field by the investors. I would have
>     fewer worries about this change in ownership if (IF!) PIR actually
>     was incorporated as a Benefit Corporation (B Corp), if this sale
>     goes forward. Incorporation as a B Corp (and not just B Lab
>     "Certification") should become a condition of any sale of PIR, to
>     any buyer.
>
>     Sam Lanfranco
>
>         ---- Original Message ----
>         *From*: Ayden Férdeline <icann at FERDELINE.COM
>         <mailto:icann at FERDELINE.COM>>
>         *To*: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
>         <mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
>         *Sent*: Tue, Dec 10, 2019, 8:01 AM
>         *Subject*: ICANN has sent a letter to ISOC
>
>         https://www.icann.org/news/blog/org-update
>
>         ICANN has broken its silence, and has published a blog post on
>         .ORG and shared a letter that its General Counsel has sent to
>         the Internet Society today "asking them to please be clear and
>         open in all of their communications."
>
>         Ayden Férdeline
>
>
>
> -- 
> *Ogundele Olumuyiwa Caleb*
> /*muyiwacaleb at gmail.com <mailto:muyiwacaleb at gmail.com>*/
> /*234 - 8077377378*/
> /*234 - 07030777969*/

-- 
hvale vale
sarajevo / the internet

mail: hvale at riseup.net
mobile: +387 61 484 038
blog: http://www.hvale.me
twitter: @froatosebe

There is no such thing as a single issue-struggle, because we do not live single-issue lives (Audre Lourde)

Fingerprint 30AA 9445 D878 A6C9 FE41 E90D 52A5 36A6 B249 EDA9

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20191211/2e41b394/attachment.htm>