<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>Agree, it sound so boringly repetitive of collusive and corrupted
way of doing things. <br>
</p>
<p>Bluntly pretend they do not know or see anything meaningful about
timing and personality involved.</p>
<p>hv<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12/10/19 4:51 PM, Caleb Olumuyiwa
Ogundele wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAL_ZvK7eYRwBN_tP8uzGfKhts3bLHwB6R5+juSEa8f5Q7QfOSQ@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>What baffles me is the concern on the timeline. For
emphasis... The timeline and how ICANN is also trying to
protect her image from the body language of the letter and
blog. To put in perspective see below:<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>1. Andrew Sulivan informed ISOC Chapter Delegates on: <span
style="color:rgb(255,0,0)"><b>November 14, 2019</b></span></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>According to the letter published by ICANN general counsel
it says: <br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><span style="color:rgb(255,0,0)">2. "<b>On 14 November 2019</b>,
</span>PIR formally notified <abbr title="Internet Corporation
for Assigned Names and Numbers" class="gmail-">ICANN</abbr> of
the proposed transaction. Under the .ORG Registry Agreement,
PIR must obtain <abbr title="Internet Corporation for Assigned
Names and Numbers">ICANN</abbr>’s prior approval before any
transaction that would result in a change of control of the
registry operator. Typically, similar requests to <abbr
title="Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers">ICANN</abbr> are
confidential; we asked PIR for permission to publish the
notification and they declined our request."</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>If I understand correctly, this notice should have been
filed earlier to ICANN (at least 30 days notice) before making
a public notice os such acquisition? I might be miss something
here?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The fact that PIR failed to give a prior notice itself is a
breach of the agreement to nullify the transaction.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>By the way, why did ICANN wait till the pressure was high
in the wind before making a public statement?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Caleb Ogundele</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 4:02
PM Sam Lanfranco <<a href="mailto:lanfran@yorku.ca"
moz-do-not-send="true">lanfran@yorku.ca</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div><font size="2" face="Tahoma">
<div><font size="2">All,</font></div>
<div><font size="2">Just For the Record, I have entered
the following personal comment into the COMMENTS
section for the letter at: </font><a
href="https://www.icann.org/news/blog/org-update"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.icann.org/news/blog/org-update</a><br>
<div><br>
<p>As a stakeholder in the .org community, and member
of <abbr title="Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group">NCSG</abbr>/NPOC
there are a number of issues that concern me here,
but a major one is that while Ethos Capital is
making promises about the future, there is no track
record for the newly formed Ethos, or evidence of
expertise in the registry field by the investors. I
would have fewer worries about this change in
ownership if (IF!) PIR actually was incorporated as
a Benefit Corporation (B Corp), if this sale goes
forward. Incorporation as a B Corp (and not just B
Lab "Certification") should become a condition of
any sale of PIR, to any buyer.</p>
<form method="post"
action="http:///news/blog_comments/2791"></form>
Sam Lanfranco<br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<blockquote style="border-left:2px solid
rgb(0,0,0);margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px">----
Original Message ----<br>
<b>From</b>: Ayden Férdeline <<a
href="mailto:icann@FERDELINE.COM" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">icann@FERDELINE.COM</a>><br>
<b>To</b>: <a
href="mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU</a><br>
<b>Sent</b>: Tue, Dec 10, 2019, 8:01 AM<br>
<b>Subject</b>: ICANN has sent a letter to ISOC<br>
<br>
<div><a
href="https://www.icann.org/news/blog/org-update"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.icann.org/news/blog/org-update</a><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>ICANN has broken its silence, and has published
a blog post on .ORG and shared a letter that its
General Counsel has sent to the Internet Society
today "asking them to please be clear and open in
all of their communications."<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Ayden Férdeline</div>
</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</font></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br clear="all">
<br>
-- <br>
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature">
<div dir="ltr"><b><font size="4" color="#33ccff">Ogundele
Olumuyiwa Caleb</font></b>
<div><font color="#993300"><i><b><a
href="mailto:muyiwacaleb@gmail.com" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">muyiwacaleb@gmail.com</a></b></i></font></div>
<div><i><b><font color="#666666">234 - 8077377378</font></b></i></div>
<div><i><b><font color="#666666">234 - 07030777969</font></b></i></div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
hvale vale
sarajevo / the internet
mail: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:hvale@riseup.net">hvale@riseup.net</a>
mobile: +387 61 484 038
blog: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.hvale.me">http://www.hvale.me</a>
twitter: @froatosebe
There is no such thing as a single issue-struggle, because we do not live single-issue lives (Audre Lourde)
Fingerprint 30AA 9445 D878 A6C9 FE41 E90D 52A5 36A6 B249 EDA9
</pre>
</body>
</html>