[Comment] ATRT3 - Survey

[Rafik Dammak]

thanks Sam,
we have some NCSG members participating in ATRT3, maybe they can respond to
your comments and explain the thinking behidn the survey design?

Best,

Rafik
Le mer. 21 août 2019 à 00:21, Sam Lanfranco <Lanfran at yorku.ca> a écrit :

> Thanks Rafik,
>
> I would like to hear from some of the NCSG members who have completed
> the survey. I found it poorly structured. At the trivial level, if
> one had reservations about a statement, neither supporting nor
> opposing it, the only option was "No Opinion", where one might have a
> strong opinion about the mechanism within the statement, but no way,
> no text box, to express that opinion.
>
> At a minimum, such survey instruments usually have text boxes for
> comments, or at least a final text box so that respondents can have
> their say about issues missed, or questions that required comments. I
> hope that ICANN can do better next time.
>
> Sam Lanfranco
>
> Quoting Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM>:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
> >
> > The third Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT3) has
> > published a survey for SO/AC and community asking for input.
> >
>   < rest deleted>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20190820/6e226e7d/attachment.htm>