[Urgent] [Public Comment] Proposed Renewal of .org Registry Agreement

Ayden Férdeline icann at FERDELINE.COM
Mon Apr 29 08:54:38 EEST 2019


I'm sure there are a few domainers amongst the commenters, but when I read through a handful of them last night I was struck by how may were submitted by legitimate not-for-profits, charities, boy scout troop leaders, churchs, schools, and many individual .org registrants who used their domain and said it was the only one they had. And I found many of their arguments persuasive: that PIR is a monopoly, that if this went out to tender prices would go down not up, and that they have built their identities around their .org domain so cannot easily move to another TLD.

Best wishes, Ayden

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Monday, April 29, 2019 3:50 PM, Mueller, Milton L <milton at GATECH.EDU> wrote:

> Sorry, for those of you not familiar with the term “domainers” these are people who register a lot of names and sit on them and hope to re-sell them.
>
> For these actors, the registry price is the cost of holding inventory. So their opposition to any price increase from .org is basically just a way to increase their profit margins. It has very little to do with the ordinary domain name registrant who actually uses the name.
>
> Domaining is a perfectly legitimate business, but let’s not confuse their interest with our main constituency’s interests.
>
> From: NCSG-Discuss <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU> On Behalf Of Mueller, Milton L
> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 9:46 AM
> To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
> Subject: Re: [Urgent] [Public Comment] Proposed Renewal of .org Registry Agreement
>
> Yeah, domainers are well-organized and vocal, Kathy.
>
> ;-)
>
> Hi All,
>
> You should see what’s going on out there: there are hundreds of comments opposing the proposed changes to the .ORG contract.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20190429/47d5f431/attachment.htm>


More information about the Ncsg-discuss mailing list