[For comment] Membership approval guidelines

[Raoul Plommer]

I would not go for removing the dual membership. I see no harm in having
the individual having a personal and an organisational identity in the
NCSG. It will create many repeat applications from people that are already
active in our community, when they change organisation or they want to give
room for new organisational representatives. They would then have to apply
again and that's just a waste of time for everyone. IF we need to change
something about it, it would be to remove the voting right of the other
identity, basically, whichever had less weight.

-Raoul

On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 at 01:22, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I have incorporated your comments as much as I could and sent this
> document to the Executive Committee for approval as well.
>
> This is to be reviewed by 14th of September.
>
> Best
> Farzaneh
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 3:59 AM farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> All
>>
>> This is a brief membership approval process and members application
>> guideline.
>>
>> It is in the format of Q and A so that it's easier to read and follow.
>>
>> Please comment, this is not a complete document and we would like to
>> complete it with your help:
>>
>> Membership approval guidelines
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vb4a7KnsDwqQlKCMkQx2y8DlykYkT2z3ODxMweGcxTE/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>> We will have until 21 August to finalize, add and remove from the
>> document and then send to NCSG EC for comments.
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Farzaneh
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20180909/c72e2b48/attachment.htm>