[Public Comment Review] RDS/Whois2 review team draft report

Remmy Nweke remmyn at GMAIL.COM
Sat Nov 17 04:54:00 EET 2018


Lots of fishy stuff on the strategy.

On Fri, 16 Nov 2018, 6:32 p.m. Stephanie Perrin, <
stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:

> Exactly.  And it came on the heels of the Board reaching out to stop the
> SSAC Review.
> On 2018-11-16 12:09, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
>
> From what I understand, the proposal from ICANN org to suspend the work of
> the RDS 2 Review Team came about in July 2018, when the Review Team was
> already scheduled to have a face-to-face meeting in Brussels that same
> month. Because it seemed near, then, to completing its work, cancelling it
> and starting the process all over again in 2019 (before we even knew that
> the EPDP would be initiated, or whether it would make any progress) seemed
> premature when the RDS 2 RT had already completed the bulk of its work. I
> think that's why the NCSG, at the time, supported the RDS 2 RT continuing.
>
> Ayden
>
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On Friday, 16 November 2018 17:55, Mueller, Milton L <milton at GATECH.EDU>
> <milton at GATECH.EDU> wrote:
>
> I am just curious about this part of the comment:
>
>
>
> “Having said that, we do therefore approve of the group continuing its
> work once it started, and did not agree with the ICANN Org proposal to the
> GNSO Council to stop or restrict this review.”
>
>
>
> Now, I do not follow the intricacies of this WG closely, but if it’s true
> that the ePDP and temp spec obsolete much of what the RDS group did, why do
> we want it to continue? Do we not have enough work to do?
>
>
>
> *From:* NCSG-Discuss [mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
> <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>] *On Behalf Of *Rafik Dammak
> *Sent:* Friday, November 16, 2018 6:37 AM
> *To:* NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
> *Subject:* [Public Comment Review] RDS/Whois2 review team draft report
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> We got a draft comment for NCSG on the RDS/Whois review team draft report:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ip83GbdtK2RSMEaNo8pt-sifqL-FtiKINfC0UvIYmjk/edit
> . You can find the report here
> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/rds-whois2-review-2018-09-04-en .
>
>
>
> Please review the draft and add your comments (if you want to add an edit
> please do it under "suggestion mode"). We got a short timeframe to get this
> finalized.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
>
> Rafik
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20181117/02130796/attachment.htm>


More information about the Ncsg-discuss mailing list