[Public Comment Review] RDS/Whois2 review team draft report

[Stephanie Perrin]

Exactly.  And it came on the heels of the Board reaching out to stop the SSAC Review.

On 2018-11-16 12:09, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
From what I understand, the proposal from ICANN org to suspend the work of the RDS 2 Review Team came about in July 2018, when the Review Team was already scheduled to have a face-to-face meeting in Brussels that same month. Because it seemed near, then, to completing its work, cancelling it and starting the process all over again in 2019 (before we even knew that the EPDP would be initiated, or whether it would make any progress) seemed premature when the RDS 2 RT had already completed the bulk of its work. I think that's why the NCSG, at the time, supported the RDS 2 RT continuing.

Ayden


‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Friday, 16 November 2018 17:55, Mueller, Milton L <milton at GATECH.EDU><mailto:milton at GATECH.EDU> wrote:


I am just curious about this part of the comment:



“Having said that, we do therefore approve of the group continuing its work once it started, and did not agree with the ICANN Org proposal to the GNSO Council to stop or restrict this review.”



Now, I do not follow the intricacies of this WG closely, but if it’s true that the ePDP and temp spec obsolete much of what the RDS group did, why do we want it to continue? Do we not have enough work to do?



From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] On Behalf Of Rafik Dammak
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 6:37 AM
To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU<mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
Subject: [Public Comment Review] RDS/Whois2 review team draft report



Hi all,



We got a draft comment for NCSG on the RDS/Whois review team draft report: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ip83GbdtK2RSMEaNo8pt-sifqL-FtiKINfC0UvIYmjk/edit . You can find the report here https://www.icann.org/public-comments/rds-whois2-review-2018-09-04-en .



Please review the draft and add your comments (if you want to add an edit please do it under "suggestion mode"). We got a short timeframe to get this finalized.



Best Regards,



Rafik

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20181116/e50c820a/attachment.htm>