new paper from the IWGDPT

[Farell FOLLY]

Hi all,

Thanks Stephanie for sharing this.

@Dr Milton, Internet Protocol is already being used in some of these IoT devices and that applies to cars, too. Especially the 6LowPAN <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/6LoWPAN> (IPv6 LoW Power wireless Area Networks) protocol is an adaption of IPv6 for such devices and there is an IETF group dealing with that. (LoRaWAN <https://lora-alliance.org/about-lorawan> is an example of large scale deployment of IoT devices using IP)

Also, the SSAC is currently studying if and how the IoT (more importantly as the number of devices is expressed in billions) could break some rules in the DNS ecosystem. So we should not deny any possibility too early. I believe that at some point there could an adapted DNS/DNSSEC protocol for the stub servers within IoT devices/gateways. Therefore, it could be a game changer.

I wish a nice week to all.




@__f_f__

Best Regards
____________________________________

(Ekue) Farell FOLLY
NCUC Rep. to the NCSG Policy Committee
linkedin.com/in/farellf 






> On 11 Nov 2018, at 21:41, Mueller, Milton L <milton at GATECH.EDU> wrote:
> 
> Steph:
> This paper deals with connected vehicles. You say that domain names will “undoubtedly be involved” at some point. I seriously don’t think they will be. The latency involved in resolving domain names would not be suitable for vehicle guidance. It’s not even clear that internet protocol will be involved in these technologies.
>  
> FWIW
> --MM
>   <>
> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] On Behalf Of Stephanie Perrin
> Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2018 11:46 AM
> To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
> Subject: new paper from the IWGDPT
>  
>  This is slightly off-topic, but members of this list who track IOT and privacy might be interested in this recently released paper from the Berlin Group (aka the International Working Group on Data Protection in Telecommunications).  No specific focus on the DNS but this working paper is a good roundup of latest data protection thinking on this topic.  There will undoubtedly be domain names involved at some point, the question seems to me to be who will control the data from a content perspective.
> 
> Stephanie Perrin
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20181112/5322d85a/attachment.htm>