new paper from the IWGDPT

[Stephanie Perrin]

Oh I totally agree that they will not be involved in the guidance systems, but there are so many other personalization systems where they might be....eg entertainment.

cheers SP

On 2018-11-11 15:41, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
Steph:
This paper deals with connected vehicles. You say that domain names will “undoubtedly be involved” at some point. I seriously don’t think they will be. The latency involved in resolving domain names would not be suitable for vehicle guidance. It’s not even clear that internet protocol will be involved in these technologies.

FWIW
--MM

From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] On Behalf Of Stephanie Perrin
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2018 11:46 AM
To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU<mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
Subject: new paper from the IWGDPT


 This is slightly off-topic, but members of this list who track IOT and privacy might be interested in this recently released paper from the Berlin Group (aka the International Working Group on Data Protection in Telecommunications).  No specific focus on the DNS but this working paper is a good roundup of latest data protection thinking on this topic.  There will undoubtedly be domain names involved at some point, the question seems to me to be who will control the data from a content perspective.

Stephanie Perrin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20181111/a53f3a8b/attachment.htm>