[Public Comments] Call for Volunteers for Draft Final Report Nomcom Review

Kris Seeburn seeburn.k at GMAIL.COM
Wed Mar 28 02:02:47 EEST 2018


+1 ---

> On Mar 28, 2018, at 11:00, William Drake <wjdrake at GMAIL.COM> wrote:
> 
> Hi
> 
> Quick morning coffee scan: On the question of balanced representation that’s been discussed here previously, they punted the ball and call for a working group every five years to evaluate the issue.  No solution offered on diversity, independence, bias and bloc voting.  But a few good points on institutional memory, consistent criteria of evaluation, SSAC/RSAC voting, formalizing comms with SOACs.  In general, not responsive to recent shenanigans but no surprise there.
> 
> Bill
> 
>> On Mar 28, 2018, at 01:48, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM <mailto:rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> We have a new public comment regarding the draft final report of nomcom review https://www.icann.org/public-comments/nomcom2-review-2018-03-27-en <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/nomcom2-review-2018-03-27-en>. The review is an important process to evaluate and do a structural assessment of organization like nomcom. 
>> We expressed previously some concerns about the non-commercial  representation there and during our NCSG meeting in PR we discussed about the changes on operatinng procedures. This is an another opportunity for us to reinforce our points and to review the recommendations from the independent examiner which may be far from being satisfactory. 
>> 
>> I created a google doc here https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lBL_xRnYeIzQYXjK4nw0P8b7_cEOOuZVNouzdp3uvgU/edit <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lBL_xRnYeIzQYXjK4nw0P8b7_cEOOuZVNouzdp3uvgU/edit> . For reference, our comment on the initial report made in last January is here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/13uG7wN5FWFa1E3cpDPfUolsIxlN4WpMw73FWOxx8VEU/edit <https://docs.google.com/document/d/13uG7wN5FWFa1E3cpDPfUolsIxlN4WpMw73FWOxx8VEU/edit>
>> 
>> It is a good opportunity for those interested on organizational matter and want to learn more about structure like nomcom and its functioning. 
>> We have Brenden and Nadira as members  in the review working party, if I am not mistaking, and also several  former NCUC representatives to nomcom who may help and give insights and advices. Reviewing the report and the background material is first step to get familiar with the issue and recommendations.
>> 
>> Please let me know offlist if you want to volunteer for drafting and join a drafting team. Farzaneh and myself will also support the team.
>> 
>> 
>> You can find previous public comment submitted by NCSG here https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Public+Comments+-+2018 <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Public+Comments+-+2018>.
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> 
>> Rafik Dammak
>> 
>> NCSG Policy Committee Chair 
>> 
>> 
> 
> ***********************************************
> William J. Drake
> International Fellow & Lecturer
> Department of Communication and Media Research
> University of Zurich, Switzerland
> william.drake at uzh.ch <mailto:william.drake at uzh.ch> (direct), wjdrake at gmail.com <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com> (lists)
> www.williamdrake.org <http://www.williamdrake.org/>
> ***********************************************
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 





Kris Seeburn
seeburn.k at gmail.com
www.linkedin.com/in/kseeburn/ <http://www.linkedin.com/in/kseeburn/>

"Life is a Beach, it all depends at how you look at it"



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20180328/f32df17b/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: KeepItOn_Social_animated.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 51490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20180328/f32df17b/attachment.gif>


More information about the Ncsg-discuss mailing list