An Access model to WHOIS Personal Data

[farzaneh badii]

Hello

Sala, the noncommercials already objected to thick whois in 2013. The
implications are obvious for the domain registrants. I will find those
statements when I find the time. The approval of thick whois registries was
a battle we lost.


Farzaneh


On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 11:21 AM Michael J. Oghia <mike.oghia at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Sala,
>
> I'd love to hear your reasoning as well. I do understand the rationale of
> avoiding a binary, black-or-white approach to complex issues. At the same
> time, however, I don't see how a thick registry would be in line with our
> values.
>
> The article Farzi shared provides a very clear and concise reason to avoid
> thick registries that is based on principles directly in line with the
> values and principles of the NCSG – namely respect for human rights,
> privacy, and consumer protection.
>
> I'm open to alternatives.
>
> Best,
> -Michael
>
> P.S. And to all those in Panama: enjoy the meeting, and good luck!
>
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 6:12 PM, Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro <
> sala at pasifikanexus.nu> wrote:
>
>> I am not pushing my view on others. I just don't see how we can take a
>> *blanket* view and approach to the Thick vis Thin Whois debate.
>> At some point would love to share my views but right now am busy marking
>> IGF Workshop proposals.
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20180625/67e1704b/attachment.htm>