[article] Whois? Whowas. So what's next for ICANN and its vast database of domain-name owners?

Ayden Férdeline icann at FERDELINE.COM
Wed Jun 6 05:15:42 EEST 2018


Unfortunately it is very difficult, but some NCSG members have explored this question before. The finding that I took away from the CCWG Work Stream 2 subgroup that was looking at this question was that there is just no better alternative, and the disruption and risks that would result from a change in jurisdiction are not worth the uncertain improvements.

Best wishes,
Ayden

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On 6 June 2018 1:55 PM, Giuseppe De Francesco <defrancescog at gmail.com> wrote:

> A very spot-on article indeed.
>
> I suppose it is time to start questioning the fact that ICANN "shall stay within US jurisdiction". It's like to state that the Internet belongs to the US. How do we go to propose an annual rotation in jurisdiction among all participating countries? Or... just move it for good to a more neutral ground like Switzerland?
>
> Regards,
> Pino
>
> On 6 June 2018 at 09:27, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> wrote:
>
>> This article in The Register is an excellent summary of the situation ICANN finds itself in today vis a vis WHOIS and the GDPR.
>>
>> https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/06/01/whats_next_for_whois_and_icann/
>>
>> "...Having ignored warnings from European data regulators for more than 15 years that Whois was breaking European privacy laws, the regulators fought back. And now ICANN has to deal with the uncomfortable reality that is no longer the internet's god but an administrative body required to do its job and no more.
>>
>> So what will become of Whois, ICANN and the US-led internet? We should know in the next year.
>>
>> ICANN has said it will devise a new Whois model within 12 months. Having been forced into a box on its policies, it will almost certainly have to listen to those voices it has ignored for a decade – and that will mean that the all-powerful US corporate interests within the organization have little choice but to continually back down in their demands.
>>
>> Whether others take this opportunity to increase their influence within the body, only time will tell.
>>
>> ICANN as an organization also has an opportunity to change with the times. The CEO and board have been able to see first hand how they were given terrible advice time and again from their own staff. The next year would be a good time to clean house and install a more diverse, open-minded and international team..."
>
> --
>
> https://about.me/pinodefrancesco?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api&utm_content=thumb
>
> Giuseppe (Pino) De Francesco
> [about.me/pinodefrancesco](https://about.me/pinodefrancesco?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api&utm_content=thumb)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20180606/6f4023ae/attachment.htm>


More information about the Ncsg-discuss mailing list